Yes I do. Because that same legal protection is not afforded the rest of the population. Bc "all men are created equal" and if all men are created equal why are some "more equal" than others? Bc the life of one person should not outweigh the life of another.
Metalject said it better than I in post 7.
I'll admit I've had my run ins with the law when I was younger and the only one I swung at was one who insulted my ethnicity. Other than that I've been cordial with police when they've been cordial with me. I've never taken a shot at a police officer either.It doesn't affect you (unless you're a scumbag who would want to take a swing or a shot at a civil servant).
And yes it does affect me. It tells me that his life is more valuable than almost everyone else when that goes against what this country was founded on. Not only that but like I said, I have a family member who is on a police force in my state. I care deeply about what happens to him on the job but I'm not deluded into thinking that a stiffer penalty for killing him would make his job safer.
You mean assault and battery against a cop? If so then yes, assaulting a cop should carry the same penalty as assaulting you or me. You only think it asinine bc you disagree with it.And does this asinine stance of your extend to assault/battery charges increased a degree of severity, or just murder and capital punishment?
Perhaps not, but how accurate is the logic and good sense if the statistics show a very different story from the one you are arguing?I'm sure you're aware of this, but statistics alone cannot replace logic and good sense.
You also didn't argue the statistics, I assume bc you haven't looked them up. So please look at the statistics I posted and tell me again that without stiffer punishments it would be open season on cops when in 2008 there were 461,000 sworn officers and in 2013 27 of them were killed by felonious acts? Yes I know the years are different but I don't think the Bureau of Justice Statistics has a more recent year.
You argued In your first post that we would run out of public servants if more were killed than civilians. The military which is tasked with protecting us as well doesn't seem to have a shortage of people signing up and enlisting when military deaths FAR FAR FAR outweigh those of public servants.
I know perfectly well who I'm arguing with and what you do for a living. It maybe personal to you but we all know emotions don't make for the best logic or good sense. As I've said several times so far, I have a cop in my family, I also have several doctors and nurses in my family, and I have teachers (I mention teachers bc Kel brought them up earlier) in my family, my girlfriend's mom and two aunts are trauma RNs. So as much as this would affect you it would affect me as well.Also, bear in mind who you are arguing with. This is personal, not an exercise in philosophy and statistics for shits and giggles.