Results 1 to 28 of 28

Thread: tren e

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    AZ Side
    Posts
    12,815
    Quote Originally Posted by XxAndreaxX
    If someone got gyno even using caber, he might got fake tren, maybe nandrolone decanoate, or plain test. Tren is tren, no matter if enanthate or acetate. Take in mind 350mg of enanthate are not 350 of acetate. 350 of enanthate are 252mg of actual hormone, 350mg of acetate are 301mg. plus add the fact that enanthate virtually never reaches the highest peak like acetate. Don't forghet UGL is hit or miss. You have always to dose enanthate much higher than acetate. For the rest, the results are exactly the same, but with much less side effects, and cheaper. for the kick in time, if dosed well, you'll feel enanthate as fast as acetate, but much smoother and less sides. Why? because enanthate builds up slower, your body will make wonders with even small amounts of tren, but will build up tollerance very soon. Acetate will give a big punch to your system and overload it at the beginning. once tollerance kicked in, acetate will stop to work much sooner.

    This has to be a statement made by someone who has not used both

    Chemicals treat us all differently, tren is one of the strongest

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    spain
    Posts
    1,295
    Quote Originally Posted by < <Samson> > View Post
    This has to be a statement made by someone who has not used both

    Chemicals treat us all differently, tren is one of the strongest
    I'm curious to know why people say acetate is stronger than enanthate...
    mg x mg acetate is obviously stronger, and it builds up faster, but end result are IMO the same... and for the same $ you get better results with enth.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    AZ Side
    Posts
    12,815
    Quote Originally Posted by XxAndreaxX
    I'm curious to know why people say acetate is stronger than enanthate... mg x mg acetate is obviously stronger, and it builds up faster, but end result are IMO the same... and for the same $ you get better results with enth.
    Why you answer on shit that you have no clue about? You obviously haven't used it and create useles babble - but ok

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    spain
    Posts
    1,295
    Quote Originally Posted by < <Samson> > View Post
    Why you answer on shit that you have no clue about? You obviously haven't used it and create useles babble - but ok
    maybe because I used both, from many different labs and know the difference??

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by XxAndreaxX
    maybe because I used both, from many different labs and know the difference??
    you ever try renvex

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •