Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: Hair Line Friendly Cycles

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    93
    Quote Originally Posted by Oki-Des View Post
    Unfortunately test should always be a base for any cycle and if you are predisposed to lose your hair it will probably continue with future cycles. Some people have had decent results with finasteride, but I think AAS will most likely win the battle.
    Thanks Oki. What if test is not used as a base for the cycle but instead merely as supplement to maintain normal (and i use that term loosely) bodily functions while another AAS is the the primary anabolic base. For example, suppose X mg/wk of a certain AAS is the equivalent dose to 500 mg/wk test E in terms of anabolic effect. Then would any of the following cycles give the same anabolic effect as 500 mg/wk test E with less androgenic effect including less hair loss?

    Equivalent Tren Cycle:
    X mg/wk Tren
    160 - 200mg/wk test E
    Ancillaries

    Equivalent EQ Cycle:
    X mg/wk EQ
    160 - 200mg/wk test E
    Ancillaries

    Equivalent NPP Cycle:
    X mg/wk NPP
    160 - 200mg/wk test E
    Ancillaries

    Equivalent Anavar + EQ Cycle:
    0.5*X mg/wk EQ
    0.5*X mg/wk Anavar
    160 - 200mg/wk test E.
    Ancillaries

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    2,355
    Quote Originally Posted by razman View Post
    Thanks Oki. What if test is not used as a base for the cycle but instead merely as supplement to maintain normal (and i use that term loosely) bodily functions while another AAS is the the primary anabolic base. For example, suppose X mg/wk of a certain AAS is the equivalent dose to 500 mg/wk test E in terms of anabolic effect. Then would any of the following cycles give the same anabolic effect as 500 mg/wk test E with less androgenic effect including less hair loss?

    Equivalent Tren Cycle:
    X mg/wk Tren
    160 - 200mg/wk test E
    Ancillaries

    Equivalent EQ Cycle:
    X mg/wk EQ
    160 - 200mg/wk test E
    Ancillaries

    Equivalent NPP Cycle:
    X mg/wk NPP
    160 - 200mg/wk test E
    Ancillaries

    Equivalent Anavar + EQ Cycle:
    0.5*X mg/wk EQ
    0.5*X mg/wk Anavar
    160 - 200mg/wk test E.
    Ancillaries
    Am also curious for an answer regarding that but my guess would be that your chances of saving your hair will be better

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    HOME
    Posts
    6,898
    Quote Originally Posted by razman View Post
    Thanks Oki. What if test is not used as a base for the cycle but instead merely as supplement to maintain normal (and i use that term loosely) bodily functions while another AAS is the the primary anabolic base. For example, suppose X mg/wk of a certain AAS is the equivalent dose to 500 mg/wk test E in terms of anabolic effect. Then would any of the following cycles give the same anabolic effect as 500 mg/wk test E with less androgenic effect including less hair loss?

    Equivalent Tren Cycle:
    X mg/wk Tren
    160 - 200mg/wk test E
    Ancillaries

    Equivalent EQ Cycle:
    X mg/wk EQ
    160 - 200mg/wk test E
    Ancillaries

    Equivalent NPP Cycle:
    X mg/wk NPP
    160 - 200mg/wk test E
    Ancillaries

    Equivalent Anavar + EQ Cycle:
    0.5*X mg/wk EQ
    0.5*X mg/wk Anavar
    160 - 200mg/wk test E.
    Ancillaries
    All the answers to your question would be guessing, as no one knows how the gear will react in your body. We are all different. Some have hair no matter what, some have some hair, some have no hair, some have lots of hair in body and few in head, etc lol

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    93
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.BB View Post
    All the answers to your question would be guessing, as no one knows how the gear will react in your body. We are all different. Some have hair no matter what, some have some hair, some have no hair, some have lots of hair in body and few in head, etc lol
    Thanks Mr. BB. That's right it is a guessing game... so I'm encouraging you and others to do just that: make guesses, ideally somewhat educated ones. Figuring out what X is of course is tough but I'm sure taking a stab at what AAS may provide more bang for the buck where "bang" is anabolic effect and "buck" is hair loss may be easier.

    Everyone reacts somewhat differently to some degree to every AAS (heck every drug) out there yet generalizations can be made and are made despite that. For example, we can say with a reasonable degree of certainty that most people will have greater strength gains when taking tren than test and less strength gains when taking anavar than test. Can't we do the same for androgenic effect including hair loss based on personal experiences dabbling with the various AAS?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •