any members from france?

[Hoggage_54]

Al assad, saddam and gaddafi is what the world should have surported. These people seem to only respond to violence. They need a iron fist to keep them in line.

I posted something like this several years ago. I tried searching for the post yesterday but I couldn't find it. Tony Blair even recently stated that removing Saddam and destabilizing Iraq lead to the formation of ISIS.

ISIS also gets a lot of money by selling oil to Turkey and other neighbouring countries, as well as selling priceless artifacts to wealthy westerners.

Iraq, Libya, Syria... all secular nations, where Christians and Muslims could pray together, had high education rates and stable economies, now torn apart by western intervention, in the name of spreading democracy.

[crazy_rocks]

I posted something like this several years ago. I tried searching for the post yesterday but I couldn't find it. Tony Blair even recently stated that removing Saddam and destabilizing Iraq lead to the formation of ISIS.

ISIS also gets a lot of money by selling oil to Turkey and other neighbouring countries, as well as selling priceless artifacts to wealthy westerners.

Iraq, Libya, Syria... all secular nations, where Christians and Muslims could pray together, had high education rates and stable economies, now torn apart by western intervention, in the name of spreading democracy.

Sykes–Picot Agreement. Stupid President Woodrow Wilson promised the guys in the middle east their Caliphate after the Ottoman empire fell after WW1. Of course the Brits and the French knew history better than to allow the Progressive American President to pull this off. They purposely draw national borders that never existed which would consist of different groups of people that would not get along forever if they lived in the same county. This would result in a strong arm leader to keep everything in line thus preventing another Caliphate from rising because what strong arm leader gives up his power? If Sykes-Picot were to stay in effect the only way a Caliphate would be re-established is if one of these dictators grew powerful enough to take out his neighbors. This was what the Europeans decided to do because in case you don't know your history the Ottomans tried to take part of Europe during WW1. The Europeans knew their history and tried preventing the Caliphate from re-establishing with Sykes-Picot so they would not face another filthy Islamic insurrection into Europe as they have so many times during the medieval period and even afterwards. It also kept energy stable which was a huge plus. Well now IS openly tells us they are undoing Sykes-Picot and look what we have now. They are coming for Europe. Of course they were already after Europe buy moving in and reproducing at a higher rate than the Europeans with their low birthrate issue but this is a more aggressive takeover now.

Ignorant fools cheer when Iran stands up to IS. Iran wants the same thing that the IS wants. Iran with Hezbollah, Al Qaeda, Hamas, The Saudis and their hate schools, and whatever stupid names out there all want the same thing. To re-establish the Caliphate which is meant to take over the world. The problem is they cannot agree who will be in charge of it at this point. They are all struggling for supremacy. So all these different groups within Islam that fight for domination is really a way to insure the strongest and most ruthless people end up in charge. It's like social evolution.