Tren question

[rGus]

Notice that I said "given your suggested dosages". I was comparing my Test/NPP cycle to my Test/Tren cycle, where I ran both the NPP and Tren at ~400mg/week. I gained slightly more strength with the Tren, but if he were to run NPP at 400mg (as I did) compared to 250mg/week of Tren, I feel he would fare better with the Test/NPP cycle. I think people get a little too optimistic when they hear "Tren is 5 times more anabolic and androgenic than Test". This does not mean that you're going to gain 5x more with a Test/Tren cycle as opposed to just running Test alone. Furthermore, I am only letting you know what I have personally experienced. I had absolutely amazing results running NPP. For me, however, it was also about gains vs. side effects. For the slight advantage that Tren gave me over NPP in the strength department (again, mg for mg), the extra sides were not worth it to me, which is why I prefer NPP (in ways...yes, Tren has its place as well). So, given the OP's dosages, I would favor running something like 400mg of NPP, as opposed to 250mg Tren. In this individual case, and in my opinion, NPP > Tren. Please do not confuse this with me saying "NPP is better than Tren for strength".

That's a good analogy. Thanks for clearing things up.

[musclestack]

That's a good analogy. Thanks for clearing things up.

No problem, brother. After re-reading my first post, I can see how the point I was trying to make could have been misconstrued. Long day at work!

As mentioned, the only way to really see what works best for you is to try different compounds at different dosages. Give low-dose Tren a shot; I'm sure you'll be happy with the results. Then maybe after that, you could try a higher dose next time or give NPP a shot to compare. Good luck!