Doing DBOL for a cut can be done, but I did it real old school and wouldn't recommend that for anyone.
I dropped test entirely and ran only DBOL and hcg.
For me, hcg ain't enough and I felt the symptoms of low T very badly.

But as far as results, I got very dry and lean with no water at all.
I've tried that many times later (with test ofcourse),
and while I've kept water retention to a minimum I've never managed the same dry look on DBOL as I did when exluding testosterone completely. (Just the tiny amount coming from the hcg, which wasn't enough for me.)

So in my mind DBOL is almost a difference compound when running it without test. Ofcourse you can (I have) obtained NEARLY the same when dropping T to a very low dose (this applies to anadrol as well), but it's not something I'd chose for a cut.

Boldenone, while unpopular with many due to the long ester in EQ, and due to its low potency. (It's a weak AAS) is something I'd like as a cutter or basically in any cycle, but more so in a cut.
But it must be said I never go off AAS so recovery isn't an issue,
(Or recovery of the HPTA, I still need time to let the body "rest")
so I'd be hesitant to recommend EQ to anyone else than blast/cruisers or those who like long cycles. Ofcourse a shorter ester version could be used.

The appetite thing about boldenone is total BS IMO.
(Ofcourse I can't tell how YOU feel)
But most AAS can increase appetite, EQ no more and than f.ex DBOL.
Don't know how that had come to be an established "truth",
as I know several who use it for cutting and don't complain that after they added EQ, that's WHEN they started becoming hungry.
Had a GF who did some deca and she gained a belly,
(Just ate and ate) and proved that deca does indeed increase appetite.
Oh, I'm drifting off here. Time to eat.

And chill out people, no need for drama when everyone's on gear and probably low blood sugar or something. Just suck each other's dick and be happy.
(Or at least be happy)