Opinions on this study on AAS

[Slacker78]

Sounds rather backward no mention of underlying etiology nor of the deleterious effect of E2 buildup from AAS, it's made on older guys whom probably cycled with poor knowledge about estrogen and AI.

Bizzarro, it seems a recent study -- > "May 22, 2017"

[hammerheart]

Bizzarro, it seems a recent study -- > "May 22, 2017"

It's recent indeed yet it sounds like any other rant about steroids no useful information really just statistical draws.

Sent from my GT-I9105P using Tapatalk

[Slacker78]

It's recent indeed yet it sounds like any other rant about steroids no useful information really just statistical draws.

Sent from my GT-I9105P using Tapatalk

Statistical draws yes, but why these statistical draws always showed AAS users of which health is heavily damaged ? It seems the researchers always choose a unresponsable sample of AAS users... could it be possible ?

[hammerheart]

Statistical draws yes, but why these statistical draws always showed AAS users of which health is heavily damaged ? It seems the researchers always choose a unresponsable sample of AAS users... could it be possible ?

But the study is conducted on aged man whom probably started using AAS back in the 80-90s and knowledge about safe use was nowhere it is today, and yes, responsible AAS users are probably greatly outnumbered by abusers.

[Obs]

Statistical draws yes, but why these statistical draws always showed AAS users of which health is heavily damaged ? It seems the researchers always choose a unresponsable sample of AAS users... could it be possible ?

I would say only about 1 in 100 AAS users actually do things right. I a3m not the 1 in 100. I am one of the other 99.

Not that I don't know how to do it right.