I'd venture to say conservative use.
the average human will always go more mote more.
to the point he's calling a 750 mg test, 500mg tren, 300 mg deca and 800mg primo cycle mild.
I think if we check our human nature and keep it at doses that are just effective and not overblown , it can be minimized.
Sent from my LG-M327 using Tapatalk
Unfortunately the studies report these sides at mild dosesand a little higher dosages produced seemingly the same results in regards to the changes in the heart.
Agreed if it wasn't for the group of people in this forum opening my eyes I would have gone that route too. But if you just learn some things to know what they mean, like lipid values, liver values, RBC etc you get a slap in the face and see that what you did will take a long time to recover from. At least you have a more informed viewpoint (at least MORE informed than without the info) and know to a higher degree what the consequences are, then you can realize its unnecessary. Test and nandrolone is what I'll stick to and document results and up doses only if it proves to be worth it.
To the point of rhabdomyolysis, of course not. But very hard, close to the point where you start doubting if you will get rid of the fatigue until next training. Training experience matters a lot here so you know how much workload you can handle.
It's called delayed transformation. It's when you train just above your normal training volume/intensity such that you need a deload week to recover, but the results are greater than training at normal.
Point I wanted to make is make sure you go as hard as you can during the cycles and not cut yourself short![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)