Is test only really best for a first cycle?

[Windex]

It's all relative, apples to apples.

300mgTest+700mgEQ should produce less sides than 1000mg of Test

300mgTren+300mg of Test is not less side effect adverse than 600mg Test

At a first cycle, with no orals or 19nor you don't have a compound to fill in the blank with 200mg of Test. 300mg EQ does nothing, and to run a high dose of EQ + trt test is not a good idea as a first cycle.

Taking the standard 500mg as a first cycle if you pull out 300mg you don't really have a replacement option by skipping orals + 19'nors.

I would just run the test and not overthink it. S

I'm guilty of reading too much then going way overthinking simple things.

[MACKATTACK]

Test only first cycle is for a reason. Test should be a base through every cycle you run. The reason you run it alone is because you want to see how your body responds to the compound. If you start with 3 different compounds and you get certain side affects then how do you know which compound gave it to you. At the end of the day everyone responds differently and you need to figure out your own body. Always start simple and build from there....

[GearHeaded]

300mgTren+300mg of Test is not less side effect adverse than 600mg Test

when looking at the anabolic/androgenic effect or rating on paper-

600mg of test is = to 600mg of test

300mg tren with 300mg test is = to 1800mg of test

even though both cycles actual mg for mg is the same. the second one is much more powerful and carries quite a few more side effects along with that (if you consider HPTA shut down, prolactin sensitivity, cns overstimulation etc. an adverse side effect)

[Windex]

when looking at the anabolic/androgenic effect or rating on paper-

600mg of test is = to 600mg of test

300mg tren with 300mg test is = to 1800mg of test

even though both cycles actual mg for mg is the same. the second one is much more powerful and carries quite a few more side effects along with that (if you consider HPTA shut down, prolactin sensitivity, cns overstimulation etc. an adverse side effect)

Are you agreeing or disagreeing with me ? I'm confused.

I was saying 300 Test 300 tren has more sides than 600 test

[GearHeaded]

Are you agreeing or disagreeing with me ? I'm confused.

I was saying 300 Test 300 tren has more sides than 600 test

I wasn't trying to agree or disagree. . was just stating for the OP that different combinations of drugs , even though mg per mg may be similar, in reality they can be quite different. in regards to both their beneficial effects as well as side effects.
it was a 'neutrall' statement.. I just used your post and example of test/tren to make it