Results 1 to 24 of 24

Thread: Would her internal organs and DNA bother you?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    3,582
    Quote Originally Posted by Honkey_Kong View Post
    I really feel bad for those hermaphrodites and the people with the anomaly chromosomal pairings. It's got to be an awful way to go through life for them.
    Up until 1950, we didn't know what DNA was. So a human could have been born XY in 1930 with a vagina, breasts, soft curves, soft voice, etc., and the only way we'd know the difference is that they can't have children (but you get infertility with XX females too -- approximately 11% of American females aged 15-44 are infertile).

    In fact if you can find me an XY female with a perfect vagina, teardrop breasts and soft curves that doesn't have periods then I might opt for that.

    When I was spraying the barrel of my Desert Eagle airsoft gun, I turned it over to spray underneath, but then I realised that the barrel sits on top of the stock and you can only see the sides and top of the barrel. What's the point in painting something if nobody's gonna see it? If you told me that my girlfriend had 2 hearts, 1 lung and another organ similar to a spleen that was connected between the two hearts, then I might find it intriguing but I really wouldn't care. I'm not in the business of dissecting my girlfriends and figuring out how their innards work. I know that there's some people who you give them a radio as a child, and they end up taking a screwdriver to it and looking at all the parts, but some people just listen to the radio.

    I think there must be something in your psyche that is reacting strongly to the word 'testicle'. It isn't a a very feminine word, it makes us think of hairy muscular men with low voices. If it was located in a skin sack distended from the vulva then I might understand why you find that unattractive. When it comes to internal organs in the abdominal cavity though... it's a maze in there anyway... our intestines alone are 15 feet long.

    Since I'm a computer programmer, I might have a unique view on DNA. I see DNA as a set of blue-prints (e.g. measurements of parts), instructions (similar to a computer's CPU instructions), and settings (e.g. configuration files). If you told me that our DNA has a file "My Documents\sex.txt" and it contains 0 for female and 1 for male, but that there's another configuration file somewhere called "Program Files\Masculanisation\config" with an entry "React_Testosterone=false", then I won't have much difficulty understanding that the baby can come out female even though "sex.txt" contains a 1.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    The Dude Abides
    Posts
    10,979
    Quote Originally Posted by Fluidic Kimbo View Post
    Up until 1950, we didn't know what DNA was. So a human could have been born XY in 1930 with a vagina, breasts, soft curves, soft voice, etc., and the only way we'd know the difference is that they can't have children (but you get infertility with XX females too -- approximately 11% of American females aged 15-44 are infertile).

    In fact if you can find me an XY female with a perfect vagina, teardrop breasts and soft curves that doesn't have periods then I might opt for that.

    When I was spraying the barrel of my Desert Eagle airsoft gun, I turned it over to spray underneath, but then I realised that the barrel sits on top of the stock and you can only see the sides and top of the barrel. What's the point in painting something if nobody's gonna see it? If you told me that my girlfriend had 2 hearts, 1 lung and another organ similar to a spleen that was connected between the two hearts, then I might find it intriguing but I really wouldn't care. I'm not in the business of dissecting my girlfriends and figuring out how their innards work. I know that there's some people who you give them a radio as a child, and they end up taking a screwdriver to it and looking at all the parts, but some people just listen to the radio.

    I think there must be something in your psyche that is reacting strongly to the word 'testicle'. It isn't a a very feminine word, it makes us think of hairy muscular men with low voices. If it was located in a skin sack distended from the vulva then I might understand why you find that unattractive. When it comes to internal organs in the abdominal cavity though... it's a maze in there anyway... our intestines alone are 15 feet long.

    Since I'm a computer programmer, I might have a unique view on DNA. I see DNA as a set of blue-prints (e.g. measurements of parts), instructions (similar to a computer's CPU instructions), and settings (e.g. configuration files). If you told me that our DNA has a file "My Documents\sex.txt" and it contains 0 for female and 1 for male, but that there's another configuration file somewhere called "Program Files\Masculanisation\config" with an entry "React_Testosterone=false", then I won't have much difficulty understanding that the baby can come out female even though "sex.txt" contains a 1.
    Sounds like you have a fetish that you're trying to justify.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    3,582
    Quote Originally Posted by Honkey_Kong View Post
    Sounds like you have a fetish that you're trying to justify.
    Well let me ask you, which of these two options would weird you out more:

    (1) Licking the pussy of an XY male

    (2) Sucking the dick of an XX female

    In these two examples, the external genitalia are authentic in every way (dick gets hard, pussy gets wet).

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    The Dude Abides
    Posts
    10,979
    Quote Originally Posted by Fluidic Kimbo View Post
    Well let me ask you, which of these two options would weird you out more:

    (1) Licking the pussy of an XY male

    (2) Sucking the dick of an XX female

    In these two examples, the external genitalia are authentic in every way (dick gets hard, pussy gets wet).
    You should start taking your meds again.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Posts
    3,478
    Quote Originally Posted by Cylon357 View Post
    The most important thing I want to point out here about this thread:

    Jamie Lee Curtis was not topless in "True Lies", though none the less impressive.
    However, we might be looking at the real reason Michael Myers didn’t care for her in the movie “Halloween”.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	8FC4984F-B649-4000-8392-37179BFC4BD4.jpeg 
Views:	57 
Size:	347.6 KB 
ID:	180829  

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •