Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: igf lr3 detection time

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    10,534
    Quote Originally Posted by almostgone View Post
    Also, the vast majority of people untested opt for GH usage over IGF-1 anyway.
    Curious to hear the rationale behind depending on an igf-1 analog, sounds bizarre to attribute a gda to benefit in the strength dept or injury relief, cannot imagine it's worth the stress/controversy for a tested athlete?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    the lower carolina
    Posts
    25,455
    Quote Originally Posted by 956Vette View Post
    Curious to hear the rationale behind depending on an igf-1 analog, sounds bizarre to attribute a gda to benefit in the strength dept or injury relief, cannot imagine it's worth the stress/controversy for a tested athlete?
    Most of the IGF-1 that I've seen recently has been junk, but I did specify untested people opt for GH. .
    Most of the untested people I've interacted with seem to prefer GH over IGF-1, barring the few that opt for Increlex over IGF1-LR3.

    I haven't seen good generic IGF-1 LR3 in quite some time.
    Last edited by almostgone; 10-23-2022 at 07:11 PM.
    There are 3 loves in my life: my wife, my English mastiffs, and my weightlifting....Man, my wife gets really pissed when I get the 3 confused...
    A minimum of 100 posts and 45 days membership required for source checks. Source checks are performed at my discretion.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •