Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 121 to 160 of 305

Thread: Ask Mr.Rose any Science/Maths/Engineering/Chemistry/Physics Question.

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Airbrushing my Pictures
    Posts
    1,353
    If I am only gay for pay, than what am I?
    I don't do sexual things with men for free, so i am not gay

    I do sexual things with men for money, so i am greedy

    I don't do sexual things with men for free, I am greedy

    I do sexual things with men for money, so i am gay

    So, gay? Greedy? Bored?
    What is a scientific/biological approach to answer the question (since some argue that being gay is determined by chemical compounds/proportions in the brain)

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    A Rock And A Hard Place
    Posts
    8,925
    Quote Originally Posted by Skyler View Post
    If I am only gay for pay, than what am I?
    I don't do sexual things with men for free, so i am not gay

    I do sexual things with men for money, so i am greedy

    I don't do sexual things with men for free, I am greedy

    I do sexual things with men for money, so i am gay

    So, gay? Greedy? Bored?
    What is a scientific/biological approach to answer the question (since some argue that being gay is determined by chemical compounds/proportions in the brain)
    Your just suffering from a lot of Sexual Confusion/Frustration/Indecision/Repression, with a lot of bills to pay. Or, it could be latent homosexuality. As far as the biological approach, I'm sure DSM will be happy to personally approach you in his own biological way, helping to add his own chemical compound to your system.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Airbrushing my Pictures
    Posts
    1,353
    Quote Originally Posted by Shol'va View Post
    Your just suffering from a lot of Sexual Confusion/Frustration/Indecision/Repression, with a lot of bills to pay. Or, it could be latent homosexuality. As far as the biological approach, I'm sure DSM will be happy to personally approach you in his own biological way, helping to add his own chemical compound to your system.
    This forum is awesome...
    I think the word "taboo" has no meaning here...


  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    "Unleash Hell"
    Posts
    2,401
    Nice thread Mr. Rose!

    Elementary particle question for you...

    Protons are injected into the 1.0-km-radius Fermilab Tevatron with an energy of 150GeV. If they are acceleraed by 2.5 MV each revolution, how far do they travel and approximately how long does it take for them to reach 1.0 TeV?

    Not a hard problem to solve if you know your particle interaction/exchange very well!
    Last edited by "Maximus"; 07-03-2010 at 12:36 PM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Squating at the Curl Rack
    Posts
    3,038
    Quote Originally Posted by "Maximus" View Post
    Nice thread Mr. Rose!

    Elementary particle question for you...

    Protons are injected into the 1.0-km-radius Fermilab Tevatron with an energy of 150GeV. If they are acceleraed by 2.5 MV each revolution, how far do they travel and approximately how long does it take for them to reach 1.0 TeV?

    Not a hard problem to solve if you know your particle interaction/exchange very well!
    Thank you. Haha, i had to flick through my textbooks to find this! But it has been done.

    R= 1.0x10^3
    Initial E = 150 GeV
    acceleration/rev = 2.5 MV
    final E = 1.0 TeV

    So:

    Number of revolutions,
    N = (Delta E)/(Delta E/rev)
    N = [(1.0x10^12)-(150x10^9)](2.5x10^6)/rev
    N = 60,000 revolutions

    Distance traveled:

    d = N(2pieR)
    d = 60,000[2pie(1.0x10^3)]
    d = 376991118.4 m
    d = 376,991.12 km

    time:

    t = d/c
    t = 376991118.4/(3x10^8)
    t = 1.25663... seconds

    Correct?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    "Unleash Hell"
    Posts
    2,401
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.Rose View Post
    Thank you. Haha, i had to flick through my textbooks to find this! But it has been done.

    R= 1.0x10^3
    Initial E = 150 GeV
    acceleration/rev = 2.5 MV
    final E = 1.0 TeV

    So:

    Number of revolutions,
    N = (Delta E)/(Delta E/rev)
    N = [(1.0x10^12)-(150x10^9)](2.5x10^6)/rev
    N = 60,000 revolutions

    Distance traveled:

    d = N(2pieR)
    d = 60,000[2pie(1.0x10^3)]
    d = 376991118.4 m
    d = 376,991.12 km

    time:

    t = d/c
    t = 376991118.4/(3x10^8)
    t = 1.25663... seconds

    Correct?
    Mr. Rose,

    You were so close, bud! I give you full credit, however, for working out the problem with such detail.. +5

    The right answer is below, which I would say your answer was potentially off due to that darn calc batteries running low !

    Best bro!
    Max


    N = (delta)E/[(delta)E/rev]

    = 91.0 x 10^12 eV - 150 x 10^9 eV/[2.5 x 10^6 eV/rev] = 3.4 x 10^5 rev


    Distance (d) = N(2pieR)

    = (3.4 x 10^5)2pie(1.0 x 10^3 m) = 2.136 x 10^9 m ≈ 2.1 x 10^9 m



    Therefore,


    t = d/c

    = (2.136 x 10^9 m)/(3.00 x 10^8 m/s) = 7.1s

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    US
    Posts
    1,200
    I was watching somewhere that there are particles that are all connected, and moving one at a particular location causes a chain reaction that can be measured at another location.

    One scientist is using fiber optic cables to literally travel into the future, by sending a signal from one point to another via that cable, having it displace these particles, and actually receiving the signal thousands of milliseconds prior to it being sent, by measuring the disruption in these particles.

    What are they, (I can't recall)? And I believe this falls under the category of Quantum Mechanics???

    And explain dark matter while you're at it.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    308
    Hm, took a dip in the pool after a long day today and thought:

    If you stayed in a pool (with chlorine) for excess amounts of time - for our sake let's say one day vs. one week - would there be any very negative effects? I notice the pruning after a few hours or so - so if a full day is spent a pool - what would happen?

    Also, difference in regular pure H20?

    ^Hm, I'd like to hear about dark matter - natgeo & science channel are the SH!T when they talk about the universe.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Squating at the Curl Rack
    Posts
    3,038
    Quote Originally Posted by YoungGunsNY View Post
    Hm, took a dip in the pool after a long day today and thought:

    If you stayed in a pool (with chlorine) for excess amounts of time - for our sake let's say one day vs. one week - would there be any very negative effects? I notice the pruning after a few hours or so - so if a full day is spent a pool - what would happen?

    Also, difference in regular pure H20?

    ^Hm, I'd like to hear about dark matter - natgeo & science channel are the SH!T when they talk about the universe.
    The chlorine has no effect on the pruning of your skin. This is due to a phenomenon known as osmosis. Osmosis is described as the movement of water molecules through a semi-permeable membrane (aka your skin, cells etc) from a high concentration to an region of lower concentration until a state of equilibrium is reached. So basically, if you have a membrane (skin) and you have a cup of water with salt, and a cup of pure water, and separate them between the membrane, the water will move without inputted energy, to the side with salt as it wants to make both sides have an equal amount of salt, and hence achieve ionic/solute equilibrium. So basically, in your hands, feet, epidermis, you have water in your cells, 70% + of your body is water. In your cells, the movement of water in and out of cells (aka into the blood, into the lymphatic fluid, into cells, etc) is controlled through osmosis. It is non preferential and will move anywhere to achieve an equilibrium. So when you get into the pool, your epidermis extracellular fluid has a lower concentration of salt and minerals then the water in the pool around you. So naturally with osmosis, the water begins to exit your skin and move to the pool. This causes your epidermis to dehydrate, as it is losing water and prune up. This is why your skin gets wrinkled. Osmosis is slow, and takes a while; this is why it happens over a few hours. Now this is the reason then insist you put pool salt into your pool, to top this from happening. Remember dehydration can be fatal, so pelase drink plenty of water while swimming.

    Dark matter
    No one knows. Well everyone knows what matter is, its everything we can see, touch, feel. Well believe it or not, there is 5x more mass in the universe that is invisible and cannot be touched or seen. This matter is called dark matter, as in unseen matter. It is still tangible matter though. The simplest explanation I can give you, is that dark matter is pure energy, energy that is at such a high plain of excitement, that it has yet to slow down and start to form quarks, protons, neutrons, and hence atoms, and hence the matter we know. IT is the building block for sub atomic particles, and hence atoms. You see we can see things at a certain energy level, with is our matter we can see and touch, but when you go beyond this energy level, we cannot comprehend its existence. However we know it is there because it interacts with our electromagnetic spectrum. Simple enough?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    308
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.Rose View Post
    The chlorine has no effect on the pruning of your skin. This is due to a phenomenon known as osmosis. Osmosis is described as the movement of water molecules through a semi-permeable membrane (aka your skin, cells etc) from a high concentration to an region of lower concentration until a state of equilibrium is reached. So basically, if you have a membrane (skin) and you have a cup of water with salt, and a cup of pure water, and separate them between the membrane, the water will move without inputted energy, to the side with salt as it wants to make both sides have an equal amount of salt, and hence achieve ionic/solute equilibrium. So basically, in your hands, feet, epidermis, you have water in your cells, 70% + of your body is water. In your cells, the movement of water in and out of cells (aka into the blood, into the lymphatic fluid, into cells, etc) is controlled through osmosis. It is non preferential and will move anywhere to achieve an equilibrium. So when you get into the pool, your epidermis extracellular fluid has a lower concentration of salt and minerals then the water in the pool around you. So naturally with osmosis, the water begins to exit your skin and move to the pool. This causes your epidermis to dehydrate, as it is losing water and prune up. This is why your skin gets wrinkled. Osmosis is slow, and takes a while; this is why it happens over a few hours. Now this is the reason then insist you put pool salt into your pool, to top this from happening. Remember dehydration can be fatal, so pelase drink plenty of water while swimming.
    Thanks for the detailed answer. I knew dehydration would be a factor - couldn't believe I forgot about the specifics of osmosis. Reading halfway in - I thought maybe if you're underwater for an extended amount of time - you would lose a lot of your ions to the point where it would be fatal. Now by extended time I meant days+. But you answered my question, thanks....

    Keep the thread for my studies!!

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    texas
    Posts
    10,940
    How much tequila (40%) would a 200lbs person with 8%bf have to drink during ketosis measured at a voiding level of 15mg/dL of acetoacetic acid in order to overcome the body's natural carbonate ion buffer system and enter ketoacidosis?















    jk bro, nice thread btw

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Squating at the Curl Rack
    Posts
    3,038
    Quote Originally Posted by Phate View Post
    How much tequila (40%) would a 200lbs person with 8%bf have to drink during ketosis measured at a voiding level of 15mg/dL of acetoacetic acid in order to overcome the body's natural carbonate ion buffer system and enter ketoacidosis?

    jk bro, nice thread btw
    Does said person have diabetes? Is said person in calorie restriction? Does the tequila have the worm in it? Im guessing we are analysing urine here, so how long as the urine been standing? as ketone bodies bread down fast by bacteria.



    Lucky I'm an engineer ay? I'll leave this kind of work you phate.

    Thanks, Waiting for more questions now, actually i have to double check i answered them all.

    But if you may, explain this in regards to over coming body's natural carbonate ion buffer system?
    Last edited by Mr.Rose; 07-05-2010 at 12:49 AM.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    5,750
    Quote Originally Posted by Phate View Post
    How much tequila (40%) would a 200lbs person with 8%bf have to drink during ketosis measured at a voiding level of 15mg/dL of acetoacetic acid in order to overcome the body's natural carbonate ion buffer system and enter ketoacidosis?





    jk bro, nice thread btw
    wow hahaha

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    366
    What is the equation for converting horse power into rat power?

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Squating at the Curl Rack
    Posts
    3,038
    Quote Originally Posted by Abominator View Post
    What is the equation for converting horse power into rat power?
    (12.452* No. of horses)^(no. of escorts in my apartment being filed)-(rats health status)*(rats age in seconds) - (the mney in my bank account)

    I think that's right.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    ShredVille
    Posts
    12,572
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.Rose View Post
    The chlorine has no effect on the pruning of your skin. This is due to a phenomenon known as osmosis. Osmosis is described as the movement of water molecules through a semi-permeable membrane (aka your skin, cells etc) from a high concentration to an region of lower concentration until a state of equilibrium is reached. So basically, if you have a membrane (skin) and you have a cup of water with salt, and a cup of pure water, and separate them between the membrane, the water will move without inputted energy, to the side with salt as it wants to make both sides have an equal amount of salt, and hence achieve ionic/solute equilibrium. So basically, in your hands, feet, epidermis, you have water in your cells, 70% + of your body is water. In your cells, the movement of water in and out of cells (aka into the blood, into the lymphatic fluid, into cells, etc) is controlled through osmosis. It is non preferential and will move anywhere to achieve an equilibrium. So when you get into the pool, your epidermis extracellular fluid has a lower concentration of salt and minerals then the water in the pool around you. So naturally with osmosis, the water begins to exit your skin and move to the pool. This causes your epidermis to dehydrate, as it is losing water and prune up. This is why your skin gets wrinkled. Osmosis is slow, and takes a while; this is why it happens over a few hours. Now this is the reason then insist you put pool salt into your pool, to top this from happening. Remember dehydration can be fatal, so pelase drink plenty of water while swimming.

    Dark matter
    No one knows. Well everyone knows what matter is, its everything we can see, touch, feel. Well believe it or not, there is 5x more mass in the universe that is invisible and cannot be touched or seen. This matter is called dark matter, as in unseen matter. It is still tangible matter though. The simplest explanation I can give you, is that dark matter is pure energy, energy that is at such a high plain of excitement, that it has yet to slow down and start to form quarks, protons, neutrons, and hence atoms, and hence the matter we know. IT is the building block for sub atomic particles, and hence atoms. You see we can see things at a certain energy level, with is our matter we can see and touch, but when you go beyond this energy level, we cannot comprehend its existence. However we know it is there because it interacts with our electromagnetic spectrum. Simple enough?
    Sorry to piss on your thread again but I feel compelled to correct a few points as a former professional scientist. Which is how science works...lol

    First, the reason the skin wrinkles is not specifically known. However dehydration of the skin is not one of the more favored theories. The reason for this is that the integumentary system specifically the outer keratinized cells of the Epidermis are considered water proof or resistant. When a cell is keratinized it is said to be "water proofed." However water will leak in or out of sweat gland in the hands and feet. It is thought currently that neural output due to ion movement within theses structures causes vasoconstriction of the underlying layers to help regulate ion homeostasis. This causes a negative turgor pressure which pulls the skin down. The reason that the hands and feet experience this more than other areas is because the hands and feet do not have oil glands but have a large relative amount of sweat pores vs that of other areas of the skin. I know it's splitting hairs but it's an important distinction between a purely osmatic cause.

    Secondly osmosis is not particularly described as a slow process. If given a true semipermeable membrane the factors controlling the rate of equilibrium is that of the osmotic pressure and osmotic gradiant. Even at equilibrium water molecules pass back and forth between the semipermeable membrane. This is sometimes described as dynamic equilibrium in biology.

    Lastly, dark matter by definition does not radiate any EM energy in any spectrum. It's presence can only be detected by it's gravitational effects on space/time, normal matter or gravitational lensing. Matter and energy are interchangeable. Which is why there is also a term called dark energy.
    Last edited by MuscleScience; 07-11-2010 at 12:21 AM.
    “If you can't explain it to a second grader, you probably don't understand it yourself.” Albert Einstein

    "Juice slow, train smart, it's a long journey."
    BG

    "In a world full of pussies, being a redneck is not a bad thing."
    OB

    Body building is a way of life..........but can not get in the way of your life.
    BG

    No Source Check Please, I don't know of any.


    Depressed? Healthy Way Out!

    Tips For Young Lifters


    MuscleScience Training Log

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Squating at the Curl Rack
    Posts
    3,038
    Quote Originally Posted by MuscleScience View Post
    Sorry to piss on your thread again but I feel compelled to correct a few points as a former professional scientist. Which is how science works...lol

    First, the reason the skin wrinkles is not specifically known. However dehydration of the skin is not one of the more favored theories. The reason for this is that the integumentary system specifically the outer keratinized cells of the Epidermis are considered water proof or resistant. When a cell is keratinized it is said to be "water proofed." However water will leak in or out of sweat gland in the hands and feet. It is thought currently that neural output due to ion movement within theses structures causes vasoconstriction of the underlying layers to help regulate ion homeostasis. This causes a negative turgor pressure which pulls the skin down. The reason that the hands and feet experience this more than other areas is because the hands and feet do not have oil glands but have a large relative amount of sweat pores vs that of other areas of the skin. I know it's splitting hairs but it's an important distinction between a purely osmatic cause.

    Secondly osmosis is not particularly described as a slow process. If given a true semipermeable membrane the factors controlling the rate of equilibrium is that of the osmotic pressure and osmotic gradiant. Even at equilibrium water molecules pass back and forth between the semipermeable membrane. This is sometimes described as dynamic equilibrium in biology.

    Lastly, dark matter by definition does not radiate any EM energy in any spectrum. It's presence can only be detected by it's gravitational effects on space/time, normal matter or gravitational lensing. Matter and energy are interchangeable. Which is why there is also a term called dark energy.
    Very interesting MS, i will have to read up on that as i would love to add it to my knowledge base. I was taught its effects were from osmosis in high school, and have never done much reading on it apart from that, so thats great to know. I will gladly eat my humble pie, and you are more than welcome to correct anything that you feel like. . Like i said, i liek to be corrected, it means next time i can givethe correct answer. Yep, but would you say our cells are a true true semipermeable membrane?

    I don't recall if i said it did radiate EM, i said that it interferes with our EM. If my memory serves correct, its main composite of 'regular' dark matter (exluding dark energy, hard dark matter, etc) is neutrinos, which then have a nice interaction with different colored quarks, bosons and leptons. Gravitational lensing can only show the existence of the matter, it still takes some quantum mechanics to explain the distribution of energy amongst the subatomic particles. Much is still unknown and theory however. Pass me your two cents on the matter (no pun intended ) MuscleScience, it would be interesting to see another view on the matter at hand.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    ShredVille
    Posts
    12,572
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.Rose View Post
    Very interesting MS, i will have to read up on that as i would love to add it to my knowledge base. I was taught its effects were from osmosis in high school, and have never done much reading on it apart from that, so thats great to know. I will gladly eat my humble pie, and you are more than welcome to correct anything that you feel like. . Like i said, i liek to be corrected, it means next time i can givethe correct answer. Yep, but would you say our cells are a true true semipermeable membrane?

    I don't recall if i said it did radiate EM, i said that it interferes with our EM. If my memory serves correct, its main composite of 'regular' dark matter (exluding dark energy, hard dark matter, etc) is neutrinos, which then have a nice interaction with different colored quarks, bosons and leptons. Gravitational lensing can only show the existence of the matter, it still takes some quantum mechanics to explain the distribution of energy amongst the subatomic particles. Much is still unknown and theory however. Pass me your two cents on the matter (no pun intended ) MuscleScience, it would be interesting to see another view on the matter at hand.
    The cells in the human body have specific structures to allow water molecules to pass in and out of the cells freely. These are called aquaporins, which are membrane spanning proteins that allow the selective transport of water molecules in and out of the cell single file. Many human cells have these pores. Most cells to some degree can regulate their ion/water content within the human bodies environment. However if these cells where placed in a hypo/hypertonic solution they would not be able to regulate themselves effectively enough and would ultimately die.


    Dark matter does not interact with any know EM energy source whether it be visible light, xray, gamma Ray ect. This is how this form of matter got it's name because it can not be physically seen in a direct manner. Only it's gravitational effects can be measured. For example the Hubble Space Telescope mapped regions of dark matter only by measuring the gravitational lensing effect. Basically this form of matter is invisible, if you shined dark matter with a flash light, you would not see any light being reflected back. Essientially the light would pass right through the matter as though it wasn't there. It simply does not interact with the dark manner in any measurable way.
    “If you can't explain it to a second grader, you probably don't understand it yourself.” Albert Einstein

    "Juice slow, train smart, it's a long journey."
    BG

    "In a world full of pussies, being a redneck is not a bad thing."
    OB

    Body building is a way of life..........but can not get in the way of your life.
    BG

    No Source Check Please, I don't know of any.


    Depressed? Healthy Way Out!

    Tips For Young Lifters


    MuscleScience Training Log

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    flying from the ashes
    Posts
    3,966
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.Rose View Post
    Very interesting MS, i will have to read up on that as i would love to add it to my knowledge base. I was taught its effects were from osmosis in high school, and have never done much reading on it apart from that, so thats great to know. I will gladly eat my humble pie, and you are more than welcome to correct anything that you feel like. . Like i said, i liek to be corrected, it means next time i can givethe correct answer. Yep, but would you say our cells are a true true semipermeable membrane?

    I don't recall if i said it did radiate EM, i said that it interferes with our EM. If my memory serves correct, its main composite of 'regular' dark matter (exluding dark energy, hard dark matter, etc) is neutrinos, which then have a nice interaction with different colored quarks, bosons and leptons. Gravitational lensing can only show the existence of the matter, it still takes some quantum mechanics to explain the distribution of energy amongst the subatomic particles. Much is still unknown and theory however. Pass me your two cents on the matter (no pun intended ) MuscleScience, it would be interesting to see another view on the matter at hand.
    like

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Squating at the Curl Rack
    Posts
    3,038
    BJJ, I'm looking at your working, and i want to go over it with my own calculations, but im having trouble reading your formulas for (5) : in the integral, after the fraction there is a little symbol, what is it? I cant tell if it is after the fraction or a part of [1+e^(2sqr(kg))].

    And with (6) (7) and (8), i can't tell they are pi's, pro-numerals, integral symbols.



    Can you elaborate? Because with my dynamical mechanics, we use different formulations.

    To everyone else, I'll answer your question ofter BJJ's, because i love maths.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Catacombs
    Posts
    5,432
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.Rose View Post
    BJJ, I'm looking at your working, and i want to go over it with my own calculations, but im having trouble reading your formulas for (5) : in the integral, after the fraction there is a little symbol, what is it? I cant tell if it is after the fraction or a part of [1+e^(2sqr(kg))].

    And with (6) (7) and (8), i can't tell they are pi's, pro-numerals, integral symbols.



    Can you elaborate? Because with my dynamical mechanics, we use different formulations.

    To everyone else, I'll answer your question ofter BJJ's, because i love maths.
    The symbol you ask about is Gamma (Γ).

    Regarding (6), (7) and (8), I explained above the drawing their meaning.
    What is not clear exactly?

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Squating at the Curl Rack
    Posts
    3,038
    Quote Originally Posted by BJJ View Post
    The symbol you ask about is Gamma (Γ).

    Regarding (6), (7) and (8), I explained above the drawing their meaning.
    What is not clear exactly?
    I thought it was gamma, but it looked like a number to me, . Is it to the right of the fraction?

    Ok got it, so its r=ro*sr*v^2 and k = (1/2)ro*sr*cd*(g/p)

    With 8, is it 3/p or 0.3/p

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Catacombs
    Posts
    5,432
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.Rose View Post
    I thought it was gamma, but it looked like a number to me, . Is it to the right of the fraction?

    Ok got it, so its r=ro*sr*v^2 and k = (1/2)ro*sr*cd*(g/p)

    With 8, is it 3/p or 0.3/p
    Yes, it is outside the fraction but within the parenthesis.

    Do not forget the coefficient of aerodynamic drag above there...

    Regarding 8, it is 0.3/p

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Squating at the Curl Rack
    Posts
    3,038
    Quote Originally Posted by BJJ View Post
    Yes, it is outside the fraction but within the parenthesis.

    Do not forget the coefficient of aerodynamic drag above there...

    Regarding 8, it is 0.3/p
    thankyou.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    30,963
    Rose where were you when i was paying people to do my calculus homework ?

  26. #26
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Squating at the Curl Rack
    Posts
    3,038
    Quote Originally Posted by DSM4Life View Post
    Rose where were you when i was paying people to do my calculus homework ?
    I was close by babe, remember that peeping tom you had during high school?... yeh that was me. Sorry for all the soiled underwear.


  27. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    30,963
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.Rose View Post
    I was close by babe, remember that peeping tom you had during high school?... yeh that was me. Sorry for all the soiled underwear.

    I enjoyed those.

  28. #28
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Squating at the Curl Rack
    Posts
    3,038
    In (1), is first equation, y is a second derivative? aka f''(y), and last equation, y is first derivative, obviously because it = 0.

    In number (3), first two are first order derivatives? f'(y) and f'(v) ?

    OK im good to go, let me work some shit out.

  29. #29
    stevey_6t9's Avatar
    stevey_6t9 is offline RIP Aziz "Zyzz" Sergeyevich Shavershian - Veni Vidi Vici
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Mt. Olympus
    Posts
    3,991
    1. What is the major product obtained from the following reaction?


  30. #30
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Squating at the Curl Rack
    Posts
    3,038
    Quote Originally Posted by stevey_6t9 View Post
    1. What is the major product obtained from the following reaction?

    Don't toy with me son!

    If an alkyl benzene is treated and in teh precense of a radical stimulator, bromination occurs exclusively on the benzylic carbon. The intermediate is stabilized by resonance with the ring.

    So the answer should be (d)

  31. #31
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Squating at the Curl Rack
    Posts
    3,038
    Also stevey, (c) is not even possible! where is that Br getting its electron from? that carbon on the benzene is totally full! so that leaves (c) out 100%

  32. #32
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Squating at the Curl Rack
    Posts
    3,038
    Btw, BJJ, i love your degree's, impressive.

  33. #33
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Catacombs
    Posts
    5,432
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.Rose View Post
    Btw, BJJ, i love your degree's, impressive.
    Well, actually I am impressed by yours!

    Even though, I do not understand the name of the course of degree you took.
    In Italy we do not have such a mix of sciences...

  34. #34
    stevey_6t9's Avatar
    stevey_6t9 is offline RIP Aziz "Zyzz" Sergeyevich Shavershian - Veni Vidi Vici
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Mt. Olympus
    Posts
    3,991
    lol dangnamit, i gota find a question your smart whore ass cant do!

  35. #35
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Squating at the Curl Rack
    Posts
    3,038
    Quote Originally Posted by stevey_6t9 View Post
    lol dangnamit, i gota find a question your smart whore ass cant do!

  36. #36
    stevey_6t9's Avatar
    stevey_6t9 is offline RIP Aziz "Zyzz" Sergeyevich Shavershian - Veni Vidi Vici
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Mt. Olympus
    Posts
    3,991
    ok mofo lets see this Nerst equation

    For the cell

    Zn/ ZN2+ // Cu2+/ Cu
    E cell = 1.103V

    Calculate the cell voltage when ( Zn2+) = 0.964 M and (Cu2+) = 0.103M at 298K

    Answer to 4 sig figures.

    PS i got this correct so you probably will too, but im searching for the ultimate extra hard q.

  37. #37
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    ShredVille
    Posts
    12,572
    Nice thread!
    “If you can't explain it to a second grader, you probably don't understand it yourself.” Albert Einstein

    "Juice slow, train smart, it's a long journey."
    BG

    "In a world full of pussies, being a redneck is not a bad thing."
    OB

    Body building is a way of life..........but can not get in the way of your life.
    BG

    No Source Check Please, I don't know of any.


    Depressed? Healthy Way Out!

    Tips For Young Lifters


    MuscleScience Training Log

  38. #38
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Squating at the Curl Rack
    Posts
    3,038
    Quote Originally Posted by MuscleScience View Post
    Nice thread!
    Thank you!

  39. #39
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Gotham City
    Posts
    571
    Dear Mr. Rose,
    I have a chemistry question for you...
    Have you perfected your homebrew tren a recipe yet? I'm really looking forward to it.
    Sincerely,
    JSc

  40. #40
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Squating at the Curl Rack
    Posts
    3,038
    Quote Originally Posted by JScondition View Post
    Dear Mr. Rose,
    I have a chemistry question for you...
    Have you perfected your homebrew tren a recipe yet? I'm really looking forward to it.
    Sincerely,
    JSc
    Are you talking about my synovex conversion? That is yet to be perfected! Because i make my tren A at 100mg's per mL with 1% BA 20% BB and rest avacardo oil with no problem, .

Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •