Which one is more toxic??
Either Dbol@50mg or Halo@ 40mg??
Which one is more toxic??
Either Dbol@50mg or Halo@ 40mg??
Id say halo...although you would be hard pressed to find actual scientific info to back a claim that either one is more toxic, most would agree that halo is more toxic. It not only is 17-aa, but also has a 9 flourine group attached to it, which I think is what causes it to be known as a very liver toxic roid.
Originally Posted by Heavy
agreed
good post heavy... now... the ? that depends on your goal, dbol will bloat you... halo wont... dbol will render some new muscle... not much really, but some...halo wont.. halo is pure strength.. and more than dbol... but you will not have anything to show for it really based on it alone.. so u pic
Agreed also, I've heard Drol in elevated doses can be just as toxic as Halo can..will try and find where I saw that.....Originally Posted by Heavy
Thanks for the info..
Do a search theres lots of human studies with halo. If im not mistakin its used on males who enter puberty very late they give them a certain dose to help puberty kick in.
dbol at 50mgs is def toxic to your liver. halo at 40mgs is also. read hookers' profile on the two. halo is the shit from what i hear. awesome strength and vascularity. i'd much rather run halo at the end of a cycle though. dbol is good for mass, halo for strength and hardness......fighters swear by this stuff, good aggression too.
I think your thinking about Andriol (not anadrol), as this is what andriol is generally prescribed for. Although u may be right about the halotestin too.Originally Posted by groundandpoundpwr21
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)