DNP and Receptors

[reddragon4954]

I have read that a DNP run will clear out your androgen receptors and make them more sensitive to aas useage again. So running it a few weeks before a cycle could prove to be benficially in adding more muscle.

Any thoughts?

[Atomini]

Never heard of this. Where did you get this information?

[reddragon4954]

I've seen post on here that say it, but i was wondering if anyone can prove or disprove it one way or the other.

[taiboxa]

a link would be most ideal.

[aolsux00]

I have read that a DNP run will clear out your androgen receptors and make them more sensitive to aas useage again. So running it a few weeks before a cycle could prove to be benficially in adding more muscle.

Any thoughts?

I also read that running DNP will clear your receptors faster, the same article said any drug that raises your metabolism would clear your receptors faster, but I dont know if its really true.

[Atomini]

Sounds like bullcrap to me. Give me an article to see.

[magic32]

I also read that running DNP will clear your receptors faster, the same article said any drug that raises your metabolism would clear your receptors faster, but I dont know if its really true.

Not a drug...oh that's gonna cause controversy.

Won't clear receptors...not absorbed at the receptor level. Remember, DNP's fat burning is a byproduct of its poisoning, not a side effect (only drugs have these and they run alongside curative/healing properties, of which DNP as a poison has none). It disallows the body to function properly (as poisons always do), by disabling/uncoupling the mitochondria...no receptors involved.

[aolsux00]

Sounds like bullcrap to me. Give me an article to see.

http://www.isteroids.com/steroids/St...0Clearing.html

[tri-athlete]

isteroids huh

[magic32]

http://www.isteroids.com/steroids/St...0Clearing.html

There are presuppositions, implications, and alleged correlations within this article. However, its suggested use of DNP to temporarily augment the metabolic process is accurate. The rest of the article's theory contains two-parts common sense and one-part theoretical conjecture...in the final analysis he really didn't say much at all!

[Atomini]

Just read the article. Doesn't make much sense to me, and it seems as though he was just making crap up near the end.

He didn't explain the specific biochemical changes that occur at the receptor site when the metabolism is elevated. He just gave a vague analogy of 'tow trucks removing the dead cars'. Okay, but I want an explanation of this in physiology terms, which he didn't give. Also, no cited references to studies at the end of the article, which signals my bullshit alarm. If there had been at LEAST one study to cite, i'd be more inclined to believe this guy due to the fact there would be a real world study done that showed and proved that raising the metabolism via DNP (or any other method for that matter) can clear receptors.

Yes, dieting can cause glycogen depletion, which in turn can 'excite' and activate receptors to more steroid hormones and this is a method many use to prime their receptors before they engage in a cycle in order to make even better gains at the start. But that is very different from his 'tow truck' analogy, which is the equivalent of the body clearing out receptor sites of inactive steroid hormones.

Seems like alot of the article was just a bunch of conjecture.

[magic32]

Just read the article. Doesn't make much sense to me, and it seems as though he was just making crap up near the end.
He didn't explain...
Seems like alot of the article was just a bunch of conjecture.

Sometimes I wonder these types of pieces ever become site articles.