
Originally Posted by
"Maximus"
Not questioning your authority on the subject... can you submit proof to back up these statements you just made?
I understand how data/research reports can be get outdated pretty fast, but last time I read on the Nolva vs. Clomid... true, both are carcinogens, elevate liver levels, etc... but the report concluded that Clomid was more toxic, overall. However, the same report concluded that Clomid was more potent or yield better results when compared to long term use of a tomoxifen -like Nolva- in a 5yrs study, involving cancer patients.
Thanks, Max