
Originally Posted by
(1*)
i don't buy the bioavailablity of raw egg only being 51%.
a. the only study that i have ever been showed on this used a very small (5 or 6) amount of test subjects that aged from young all the way up to 76 years old. this is poor for a study.
b. it was done with one yolk and 15 whites. whites are crap. the yolk is the good stuff.
c. one scientist i read an article on argued against this study because one of the ways they measured the absorption was by measuring an added by-product chemical in the waste. the study showed that the raw vs cooked showed less chemical in the waste, thus showing that less protien was absorbed when, according to the said scientist, this could actually mean the opposite.
one study is not enough period. especially when it's done with so little test subjects.
plus i consume 8 a day. thats 560 cals, and 48 pro. if the bioavailibility was only 51% i would be loosing muscle and weight as my diet is mapped out to the T.
the body builder's of old built thier bodies from raw eggs. it's obviously beneficial.