
Originally Posted by
Test Monsterone
Zenpump is pointing to one of the hypocrisies of steroids. All of this is completely subjective. At 24 it's not ok, but at 25 it is? Well what if someone matures slower, then does their age to start steroids increase? What if someone (like me for example) looks like a full grown man at 18, is that ok then? But what if someone is physically mature enough, but not mentally? There are a million scenarios, so it's up to the individual to decide. I can make the argument that a younger person would fare better with steroids since their body can handle the stresses imposed by the steroids on the body better. Whereas an older gentleman starting a cycle may be more dangerous as far as potential for cardiovascular related issues.
Steroids is like alcohol. When should you start drinking? Should you? Probably not. But if you are, when? Well, are you able to handle the mental side effects? Are you able to control your emotions? Will you be responsible enough to stop if you run into health troubles? Do you have addiction issues in general? Do you have body image dysmorphia?
For all these questions, I don't believe there is a set age or weight/height ratio. I think it is a good idea to wait until you the brain and body have finished developing (around age 25), and enough years of consistent lifting with a proper diet have been achieved to provide a baseline from which to measure the effects of steroids. That basline can be 6'2" 150 lbs for one person, or 5'7 240 lbs for another. We can't paint everyone with the same brush. At the end of the day it's up to each of us to decide. Unfortunately, morons like Bostin Loyd or Derek Anthony should have never gotten into steroids because they were too stupid to run them, but it's still their decision at the end of the day.