Results 41 to 67 of 67
Thread: Opinion on changes to the board
-
11-16-2005, 08:09 PM #41Originally Posted by needmorestrength
or are you currently taking clomid? then i understand. lol
-
11-16-2005, 08:10 PM #42Originally Posted by 305GUY
-
11-16-2005, 08:11 PM #43Originally Posted by taiboxa
-
11-16-2005, 08:11 PM #44Originally Posted by 305GUY
I will admit it is rare but that's not the point. The System Admin wants it to end. So I do not see why this has to be drawn out like this. If you need to see porn there are many sites that will fullfill that for you.
-
11-16-2005, 08:13 PM #45Originally Posted by TheMudMan
And that girl who complained must be a very sheltered indiviual.
-
11-16-2005, 08:18 PM #46Originally Posted by 305GUY
-
11-16-2005, 08:56 PM #47Originally Posted by goodcents
This is a steroid board dude, IMO, if you want naked/half naked women hit a board dedicated to that.. maybe over there they will have problems with steroid/workout related avatars
-
11-16-2005, 10:22 PM #48Owner
- Join Date
- Mar 2002
- Location
- Texas
- Posts
- 5,148
I read the first page but needed to skip ahead to let everyone know my stance on this. If someone posted this between the first page and this post I am sorry.
It is hard for people to surf this site if they are not alone due to all of the T&A on the screen. If you are at work, have kids, or are around women (who get offended at such pictures) it is hard for people to log on. This is the same reason we dont have a HUGE STEROID .COM at the top of the forum. "Anabolic Review" is much easier on the eyes and the title has room for explaining the site vs. a STEROID only site.
Thongs WERE ok, but that lead to women bent over in thongs or close ups of thongs and way to much being revealed. An image of a fit woman in a two piece or a respectable shot of an athletic women is A-OK by me and the staff.
I hope this clears it up.
bc
-
11-16-2005, 10:30 PM #49Originally Posted by system admin
-
11-16-2005, 10:35 PM #50Originally Posted by system admin
Female members getting offended really doesnt. Its all clear now. Thanks
-
11-16-2005, 10:36 PM #51Originally Posted by 305GUY
-
11-16-2005, 10:41 PM #52AR Hall of Fame
- Join Date
- Dec 2002
- Posts
- 25,737
Originally Posted by 305GUY
Why the f*ck would I waste my time asking you that question if it weren't true?
~SC~
-
11-16-2005, 10:48 PM #53Originally Posted by SwoleCat
-
11-16-2005, 11:01 PM #54AR Hall of Fame
- Join Date
- Dec 2002
- Posts
- 25,737
Even if one female complained, that would be too many.
That reason coupled w/the SysAdmin's desires/strategy make up the reasoning for the
new regulation.
Thanks for your cooperation!
~SC~
-
11-16-2005, 11:13 PM #55
Here's a summary:
It's a Steroid board...thus we talk about steroids
It isn't a steroid-selling board...thus the disclosure of sources addresses; names; etc. is disallowed
It isn't a porn site...thus nude dude/chick-asses...poontangs and schlongs aren't allowed to be displayed here.
What's so difficult to understand there?
Here's a perspective/hypothesis:
I peruse AR in a public place (work/school)...or in the presence of someone i respect. As the page loads...an image of a nude chick's ass draped provocatively accross a sofa fills the screen.
Not cool.
-
11-17-2005, 12:49 AM #56
i wish the pictures of guys shirtless and stuff woudl come down too
i hate being at the library and having to hide this shit real quick in fear some guy is going to walk buy and be like
OMG that guy is looking at gay porn or something
-
11-17-2005, 12:51 AM #57Retired Vet
- Join Date
- Feb 2004
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 6,891
Originally Posted by Billy_Bathgate
-
11-17-2005, 12:55 AM #58Originally Posted by Billy_Bathgate
-
11-17-2005, 01:03 AM #59
for sure...lets keep that smut in the pics forum...NARK
-
11-17-2005, 01:19 AM #60English Rudeboy
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Location
- RIP Brother...
- Posts
- 5,054
Originally Posted by Billy_Bathgate
-
11-17-2005, 01:19 AM #61Anabolic Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2005
- Posts
- 2,240
Follow rules, don't flame.. if someone's feelings get hurt by something you said, simply because it's your opinion... not your fault nor is it yoru problem. The Constitution doesn't protect people's feelings Voice what you feel, because thats not an attack on anyone. Which is what is so great about this country.. your freedom of speech! We have soldier fighting for our freedoms, so you better damn well use them!
-
11-17-2005, 01:22 AM #62
nark was trying to send me naked pics the other day..i had to refuse
-
11-17-2005, 01:25 AM #63English Rudeboy
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Location
- RIP Brother...
- Posts
- 5,054
Originally Posted by SnaX
I don't want to disallusion you or get too political but I think you'll find it's more like:
Originally Posted by SnaX
-
11-17-2005, 03:35 AM #64
All right I accept alot of the new rules but... using the I'm at work excuse is kind of lame. If you're at work you should be working not looking up illegal drugs. Half naked women pale in comparision to this IMO.
-
11-17-2005, 08:01 AM #65
this rule is like 2 years old
-
11-17-2005, 10:51 AM #66Originally Posted by needmorestrength
My fault,me I didn't know that. So can you just go buy them like mexico?
I was laughing thinking about it last night.
I do see how pics can be a problem, I surf at the store (here all day anyway) and I have to change screens when people come in (have an old ass computer 99' and it freezes some times) guess it doesn't matter, rules are set and much like laws, once applied it hardly ever gets changes.
p.s. still hate the go to porn site crap Going to miss Cruises pics and links to "tatseful sites "
-
11-17-2005, 03:42 PM #67Anabolic Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2005
- Posts
- 2,240
Woah Canadians?! They still make those???!!!!!
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Dutasteride dosage while on and...
Today, 06:43 AM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS