Results 1 to 18 of 18
  1. #1
    Alfamale's Avatar
    Alfamale is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    275

    Sustanon vs Omnadren

    Any good info exept in profiles. Have someone tried both? I am looking for sust but may only get omnadren ...

  2. #2
    Dude-Man's Avatar
    Dude-Man is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Nowhere, USA
    Posts
    5,966
    it's the same.

  3. #3
    seanw's Avatar
    seanw is offline Banned
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Aussie in Singapore
    Posts
    2,296
    Quote Originally Posted by Alfamale
    Any good info exept in profiles. Have someone tried both? I am looking for sust but may only get omnadren...
    Read this thread Sustanon Vs. Omnadren

  4. #4
    BenC is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    32
    Same formula as of 2001. Omnadren in my opinion has less estrogenic side effects than Nile. Although the formula is the same the oils or methods of production may vary. I recommend Omnadren I feel it's better.

  5. #5
    03636's Avatar
    03636 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    PHX,AZ
    Posts
    116
    I just read that omnadren has a higher chance of estrogen conversion. Just something I read in a book somewhere. I would go sust jmo.

  6. #6
    BenC is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    32
    Used to yes. They differed by a single testosterone . Of course everyone does react differently to different compounds.

  7. #7
    BenC is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    32
    Omnadren also has the advantage of having no known counterfeits.

  8. #8
    Iowa's Avatar
    Iowa is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    By a bunch of cornfields
    Posts
    1,336
    Quote Originally Posted by BenC
    Omnadren also has the advantage of having no known counterfeits.
    no, they have counterfeits

  9. #9
    bignatt's Avatar
    bignatt is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    in FL (former Masshole)
    Posts
    2,421
    They both suck take test E

  10. #10
    Alfamale's Avatar
    Alfamale is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    275
    Nice tread seanw. Thx for your help.

  11. #11
    tycin's Avatar
    tycin is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Vancouver/Edmonton
    Posts
    3,717
    Quote Originally Posted by bignatt
    They both suck take test E
    my thoughts exactly! im not a fan of the mixed tests.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    njva
    Posts
    662
    BOth the same except, better chances your omnas are real plus there always cheaper than sust.

  13. #13
    sepjuice is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    EUR
    Posts
    2,278
    omna seems to hurt a whole hell of alot more

  14. #14
    youknowme's Avatar
    youknowme is offline Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    620
    Quote Originally Posted by bignatt
    They both suck take test E
    Why this hatred towards sust/omna? Test is test and sust/omna works great. If everyone only knew that the secret is to take it EOD, then alot of people would se alot better results and less sides, IMO.

  15. #15
    Tapout's Avatar
    Tapout is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    1,577
    I did some experimenting and took test e with it and loved it

    figured i've done many cycles of each why not put them together---worked for me but might not be for everyone

  16. #16
    LuvMuhRoids's Avatar
    LuvMuhRoids is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Behind Ur booty
    Posts
    3,069
    I have used both for years. Omnadren does have different compounds compared to sustanon but both rely on the same equation of ester release. It's a multi ester drug with 4 compounds. One releasing after the other. Some say Omnadren is a less cleaner drug than sustanon which is probably why it is cheaper. In my opinion, I got better results from omnadren for some reason. Although they are both good gear. I could care less which I ran but both are basically the same and both are a test.

  17. #17
    JoeyJuice is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    272
    Sust and omnadren are the same now, a year or two omnadren was different it contained two different types of test which bloated you up more then sust. Now jaffa has made it the same

  18. #18
    youknowme's Avatar
    youknowme is offline Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    620
    Quote Originally Posted by JoeyJuice
    Sust and omnadren are the same now, a year or two omnadren was different it contained two different types of test which bloated you up more then sust. Now jaffa has made it the same
    Jelfa, not jaffa...

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •