Thread: Confused about Test and Tren
-
04-29-2005, 01:59 PM #1Associate Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- In The Pink!!!!!
- Posts
- 424
Confused about Test and Tren
I have to admit, I am a little confused. I read that people are not looking to put on much size so they use Tren . I also read that tren is 200 times as androgenic and 300 times as anabolic as test. (Not sure about those numbers but it was some astronomical figures). If this is true would not tren be a better bulk drug. ****, would it not be better all around. I mean sure with any cycle I run test but for a great bulk cyle wouldn't Test and Tren be better than Deca and Test, water weight aside?
-
04-29-2005, 02:06 PM #2
has a rating of 500/500 compared to test's 100/100
-
04-29-2005, 02:17 PM #3Associate Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- In The Pink!!!!!
- Posts
- 424
So what is the answer? Anyone
-
04-29-2005, 02:18 PM #4Junior Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Location
- 713....Houston Texas...
- Posts
- 130
-
04-30-2005, 03:29 AM #5
3 times more androgenic , not 300.
-
04-30-2005, 03:56 AM #6
you can use tren for both,just adjust your diet according to wat you wnt.
-
04-30-2005, 10:24 AM #7Writer
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 1,733
No. It's 5x as anabolic and 5x as androgenic . Those numbers are from the J.Vida's book on Androgens. It's the gold standard in the industry.
The number is found by giving male winstar rats the steroid in question and then sacrificing them; the weight of their levator ani (a muscle) is weighed and so is their ventral prostate. Those weights give us the anabolic (weight of the muscle) and androgenic (weight of the prostate) components of those ratios.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Dutasteride increase during test...
Today, 01:57 AM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS