back to back cycles....

**FaTbAcK** · 08-21-2002, 09:00 AM

I have "heard" that certain acclaimed BB's stay on cycle for years...my question is I have done a 10 week cycle of test, eq, dbol ...with a sus 250 bridge @ 400 wk up until now....I want to start another cycle of test, eq, dbol. Clomid should not be considered since I will be on, right? Or at least not considered until post cycle......help me out guys and girls, thanks...

**MBaraso** · 08-21-2002, 09:04 AM

Time on = Time off.
You should wait 10 weeks till your next cycle IMO.
It's better to be safe then sorry.

**FaTbAcK** · 08-21-2002, 09:08 AM

If I was to go ahead with the cycle, would it render any gains though?

**MBaraso** · 08-21-2002, 09:20 AM

Yes I think you would gain more if you gave your receptors time to recover. Especially being this will only be your 2nd cycle.

M

**NoLimits** · 08-21-2002, 09:22 AM

Originally posted by FaTbAcK
my question is I have done a 10 week cycle of test, eq, dbol...with a sus 250 bridge @ 400 wk up until now...

That is not a bridge! It is one continuous cycle. You need to get on some clomid and let your natural test levels recover!

G-S · 08-21-2002, 10:57 AM

Originally posted by MBaraso
Time on = Time off.
You should wait 10 weeks till your next cycle IMO.
It's better to be safe then sorry.

Says who? Point me to some research where it is proven that this waiting period is needed, and I'll believe it. Until then, the old time on = time off theory doesn't hold any weight, to me anyway.

I have read reports that after 4-6 weeks your body returns to normal operations.

**Pete235** · 08-21-2002, 10:59 AM

Originally posted by Gettin Stupid
I have read reports that after 4-6 weeks your body returns to normal operations.

Can you please share those reports with the rest of us? I'd be interested in seeing them. Seriously, I'm not disagreeing, I'd like to see those reports.

G-S · 08-21-2002, 11:03 AM

Ah hell, I read them from some links that were posted on EF over 6 months ago.

Never thought I would need to save em, but the info did stick with me. I wouldn't pass on any bogus info, so no need to worry on that.

**Pete235** · 08-21-2002, 11:05 AM

Originally posted by Gettin Stupid
I wouldn't pass on any bogus info, so no need to worry on that.

I don't think that was implied, was it?

**MBaraso** · 08-21-2002, 12:51 PM

Whether the theory is true or not is iregardless in Fatbacks case because he doesn't and shouldn't be doing a 20 sum week long cycle for his first time....

M

**FaTbAcK** · 08-21-2002, 01:10 PM

This will be my 3rd cycle...and I think my mind is made up, I was just trying to get some pros and cons against doing back to back....I wish bigkev would dive in, I have read he stays on all year, and I wouldnt argue with his gains.....thanks all.

**babi** · 08-21-2002, 02:01 PM

are you looking for someone to reassure you.it sounds to me like you have already made up your mind.most of us dont think its safe or else we would be doing it all the time too(got to love the gains if you are longer on)but the ultimate decision lyes on you.you do what you got to do bro