Results 1 to 17 of 17
  1. #1
    OSTIE's Avatar
    OSTIE is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Mil-town
    Posts
    1,189

    PLEASE HELP!! w/ physics problem...

    Alright, I know there are some smart fckers on here. I need yea guys to lend me a hand here. I have some stupid physics assignment due this evening, but I havent bought the book yet and Im stumped on the last two problems. I think i can get one of them, but here is the other.

    Two equally charged particles, held 3.1 10-3 m apart, are released from rest. The initial acceleration of the first particle is observed to be 8.0 m/s2 and that of the second to be 10.0 m/s2. The mass of the first particle is 6.3 10-7 kg.

    (a) What is the mass of the second particle? (in kg)

    (b) What is the magnitude of the charge of each particle? ( in C )


    Thanks in advance,

    -ost

  2. #2
    Psychotron's Avatar
    Psychotron is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    2,556
    id help but im unclear about your 3.1 10-3m and the 6.3 10-7kg, what the heck is that.

  3. #3
    PT's Avatar
    PT
    PT is offline DUNAMIS ~ AR-Elite Hall of Famer~
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    12,158
    open up your physics book and find the answer. i took 1 class as a elective and hated it.

  4. #4
    Psychotron's Avatar
    Psychotron is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    2,556
    F = k(q^2)/r , F = m*a , q^2 since they are both equally charged

    8.0(6.3E-7)=k(q^2)/3.1E-3 where k = 8.99E9

    5.04E-6=8.99E9(q^2)/3.1E-3
    1.5624E-8=8.99E9(q^2), q^2 = 1.73793E-18, q= 1.31831E-9

    b) q = 1.31831 x10^-9 C

    a) 10(m) = 8.99E9(1.31831E-18)/3.1E-3 , 10m = 5.04E-6, m = 5.04E-8 kg

    i think thats right, if i remember coloumbs law correctly.
    Last edited by Psychotron; 09-17-2004 at 02:21 PM.

  5. #5
    Natural Mac's Avatar
    Natural Mac is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    168
    A. F1 = F2... M1*A1 = M2*A2 ... So Simple!!!

    B. Use Coulombs Law, q1 = q2. Just solve for q.

    You really need to try harder. This is first year crap! Have fun.

  6. #6
    hung-solo's Avatar
    hung-solo is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    HEELS 2005!!
    Posts
    3,590
    wtf? e=mc2......maybe? i am glad i stuck with american history and accounting

  7. #7
    OSTIE's Avatar
    OSTIE is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Mil-town
    Posts
    1,189
    yea psych. those are the correct formulas. Thanks for the help it seems correct. And you guys are correct, it is easier crap that I should know. This whole first two weeks is mostly review from the previous ph. class, but i forgot alot over summer.

    I also have not bought the physics book yet for me to read, I have to wait until my next paycheck before I can afford the other half of my books, so until then im stuck.

    Thanks for the help,

    -ost

  8. #8
    tryingtogetbig's Avatar
    tryingtogetbig is offline Whiney Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    NW of DFW TX
    Posts
    3,425
    Quote Originally Posted by Psychotron
    F = k(q^2)/r , F = m*a , q^2 since they are both equally charged

    8.0(6.3E-7)=k(q^2)/3.1E-3 where k = 8.99E9

    5.04E-6=8.99E9(q^2)/3.1E-3
    1.5624E-8=8.99E9(q^2), q^2 = 1.73793E-18, q= 1.31831E-9

    b) q = 1.31831 x10^-9 C

    a) 10(m) = 8.99E9(1.31831E-18)/3.1E-3 , 10m = 3.8231E-6, m = 3.8231E-7 kg

    i think thats right, if i remember coloumbs law correctly.


    dam.....beat me to it......

  9. #9
    OSTIE's Avatar
    OSTIE is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Mil-town
    Posts
    1,189
    actually, i noticed psyc. formula is wrong.... you didnt square the distance r

    F = [K(q1)(q2)/r^2]*[r_vector] I understand that vectors do not matter in this problem, but i just posted the complete formula anyways.

    I also did it this way before i originally posted, but I got the wrong answer so thats why I posted. I dont know if im entering it in wrong or what?

    BTW, i am using the F = ma, so ma = K*q^2/r^2

    I enter the answers on webassign, so i know if they are correct or not right away
    Last edited by OSTIE; 09-17-2004 at 01:44 PM.

  10. #10
    Psychotron's Avatar
    Psychotron is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    2,556
    oh, yea the vectors supposed to be squared. i last took physics a year ago lol

    my numbers arent the same as what mac was saying. im not sure who is right. i assumed the coloumbs equation since they give you a vector distance.

    so even with the r^2 the answer is wrong?


    8.0(6.3E-7)=k(q^2)/(3.1E-3)^2 where k = 8.99E9

    5.04E-6=8.99E9(q^2)/(3.1E-3)^2
    4.84344E-11=8.99E9(q^2), q^2 = 5.38758E-21, q= 7.34E-11

    b) q = 7.34 x10^-11 C

    a) 10(m) = 8.99E9(5.38758E-21)/(3.1E-3)^2 , 10m = 5.04E-6, m = 5.04E-8 kg



    MACS Way

    F1 = F2 , M1*A1 = M2*A2 8(6.3E-7)=10M2 , M2 = 5.041E-8kg

    our masses line up.

    note: i screwed up in my first time on the mass and later edited it when i saw the mistake when i did the calculations with the vectors squared.
    Last edited by Psychotron; 09-17-2004 at 02:24 PM.

  11. #11
    OSTIE's Avatar
    OSTIE is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Mil-town
    Posts
    1,189
    Quote Originally Posted by Psychotron
    oh, yea the vectors supposed to be squared. i last took physics a year ago lol

    my numbers arent the same as what mac was saying. im not sure who is right. i assumed the coloumbs equation since they give you a vector distance.

    so even with the r^2 the answer is wrong?


    8.0(6.3E-7)=k(q^2)/(3.1E-3)^2 where k = 8.99E9

    5.04E-6=8.99E9(q^2)/(3.1E-3)^2
    4.84344E-11=8.99E9(q^2), q^2 = 5.38758E-21, q= 7.34E-11

    b) q = 7.34 x10^-11 C

    a) 10(m) = 8.99E9(5.38758E-21)/(3.1E-3)^2 , 10m = 5.04E-6, m = 5.04E-8 kg



    MACS Way

    F1 = F2 , M1*A1 = M2*A2 8(6.3E-7)=10M2 , M2 = 5.041E-8kg

    our masses line up.

    note: i screwed up in my first time on the mass and later edited it when i saw the mistake when i did the calculations with the vectors squared.


    Finally got the force correct, I had the power one off, i tried your power and it was right. I need a friggin ti-89, im stuck using a plain old calc.

    ANYWAYS, the mass one doesnt seem to be correct... webassign though is a pain, because sometimes if you round off to early, you will be a hundreth off and itll be wrong.

  12. #12
    Psychotron's Avatar
    Psychotron is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    2,556
    both of our ways are valid for finding the mass, its not possible for it to be incorrect.
    Last edited by Psychotron; 09-17-2004 at 03:39 PM.

  13. #13
    Psychotron's Avatar
    Psychotron is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    2,556
    well it wont let me edit it so here. i did both way in one step on my ti-89 and the mass for both comes to 4.8E-7 kg

  14. #14
    SAUCYgator is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    fl
    Posts
    121
    i respect the question and the fact that you recieved a legitimate answer.... now who wants to take my genetics test for me next week?

  15. #15
    OSTIE's Avatar
    OSTIE is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Mil-town
    Posts
    1,189
    Quote Originally Posted by Psychotron
    well it wont let me edit it so here. i did both way in one step on my ti-89 and the mass for both comes to 4.8E-7 kg

    5.0e-7 is what the friggin website took as an answer. I hate this friggin software that they use for us to submit answers.

    Thanks for the help, it is greatly appreciated,

    -ost

  16. #16
    Psychotron's Avatar
    Psychotron is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    2,556
    Quote Originally Posted by SAUCYgator
    i respect the question and the fact that you recieved a legitimate answer.... now who wants to take my genetics test for me next week?
    ugh, dont look at me.

  17. #17
    tryingtogetbig's Avatar
    tryingtogetbig is offline Whiney Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    NW of DFW TX
    Posts
    3,425
    Quote Originally Posted by SAUCYgator
    i respect the question and the fact that you recieved a legitimate answer.... now who wants to take my genetics test for me next week?

    I'll take it...let me know when and where....I ain't sceered!!!!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •