Results 1 to 18 of 18
-
07-19-2006, 01:41 PM #1
Junior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Posts
- 94
Which do you think looks bigger/better?
A 18" arm at 16% bf or a 16.5" arm at 8% bf?
-
07-19-2006, 01:43 PM #2
depends on what your going for.. MASS or the LEAN look.. I would say 16.5 @ 8% bf hands down..
-
07-19-2006, 01:49 PM #3
Junior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Posts
- 94
Thats what i wanted to hear! Jst looking for some motivation to keep on cutting!!
-
07-19-2006, 01:54 PM #4
yea bro, defintely keep on the cutting track.. I dont find it impressive at all when I see BIG/THICK guys with no defintion or shape whatsoever.. I could eat everything I saw day in and day out and get to their size over time.. you see much less people who are really lean and in shape.. I rather be one of those ppl..
-
07-19-2006, 02:03 PM #5
Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Posts
- 851
Agreed. 16.5 @ 8%
-
07-19-2006, 02:23 PM #6
leaner is meaner imo
-
07-19-2006, 02:41 PM #7
that leaner arm looks just as big... & better IMO
-
07-19-2006, 03:04 PM #8
this totaly depens on how tall you are and how the rest of your body is built.
-
07-19-2006, 03:07 PM #9
Banned
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Location
- Toronto
- Posts
- 3,948
-
07-19-2006, 03:39 PM #10
depends on who is stronger in my opinion. Looking strong and actually being strong varies. This is the typical debate between bb'ers and strength athletes. As a strength athlete I say the bigger the better! Mass moves mass!!!
-
07-19-2006, 03:45 PM #11
believe it or not, i like the bulky look..to me, there is a big difference in how big i look when i have the same muscle mass @ 16% compared to a lower 12% or so
-
07-19-2006, 04:20 PM #12
When it comes to arms bigger is almost always better, even at the sacrifice of a little defeinition. JMO
-
07-19-2006, 04:45 PM #13
how about a 19 inch arm at 3% bf!!!! that would be greatness...i wish i could get/stay at 3% all year round and still be healthy
-
07-19-2006, 04:52 PM #14
Associate Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Location
- NC
- Posts
- 417
Originally Posted by legend05
16.5 at 8% definitely
-
07-19-2006, 05:02 PM #15
lean physique and cable like vasculirity with rock hard abs beats size every time without question.
-
07-19-2006, 05:56 PM #16
Associate Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Location
- NC
- Posts
- 417
I hear ya...I'll definitely sacrafice a little size for a lower BF%...I've been up to 270 before at 5'7 and looked thick as a house but my lord I felt like I had one foot in the grave!!! lolololol (probably actually did)
-
07-19-2006, 05:59 PM #17
Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Posts
- 642
shredded is better than a tub of cheese. unless your datinga really fat chick then it may go hand in hand to be a tub
-
07-19-2006, 06:00 PM #18
Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Posts
- 642
keep cutting. there's too many fat people out there. maybe it will motivate them too
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
So far so good, they seem to be doing what they’re supposed to.
Expired dbol (blue hearts)