would you of shot bin laden or took him alive

[marcus300]

If it was just you and bin laden, would you of shot him or tried to take him alive so he had to stand trial for his crimes?

[stack_it]

I would have shot him. What good is he alive? Fvck a fair trial. The thousands of people he was responsible for killing didn't get a fair chance. He should have been shot in both knees and both elbows and then put in a box full of fire ants.

[auslifta]

Alive for the humiliation, dying is too good for some people

[T_Dubp]

Shot.

[wmaousley]

I would have shot both his knees and elbows for shits and grins but made damn sure his ass was alive to live out the remainder of his life in misery

[xlxBigSexyxlx]

alive

[stevey_6t9]

alive, to take it up the ass twice a day from some nigerians

[jbm]

who is bin laden?

[NotSmall]

Best to kill him - alive makes no sense at all - after all they released the lockerbie bomber...

[Shol'va]

Dead due to the savings to the taxpayers as it would have cost us millions of dollars to bring him to justice not to mention all the security needed for his dumb ass and ours.

[grumpee]

I would have asked him how much he would pay me to let him live,lol. Heard he was worth 300 mil ? Then I would have smoked him and collected the 25 mil bounty

[X83]

Dead men don't talk.

[Times Roman]

I really don't know.
yes, I would have no issues pulling the trigger myself.
But I Personally havent' thought it through all the way, and I've been burned too many times by "unintended consequences".
There are Pro's and Con's to both actions.

So think about this for a moment, killing bin laden swiftly, and then pause for a moment and consider the benefits to the world when we took our time and put Saddam Hussein on trial.

[Ernst]

Shot him, no question.

[ghettoboyd]

i would kill him but would have gotten more satisfaction killing him with my bare hands than any gun...

[GoloLolo]

killed definetly. But it would have been nice to have a video or picture of him alive with the US soldiers to show the world before killing him. LOL

[DSM4Life]

You have to shoot him. If not he would be appealing for years while costing us millions.

[stack_it]

I really don't know.
yes, I would have no issues pulling the trigger myself.
But I Personally havent' thought it through all the way, and I've been burned too many times by "unintended consequences".
There are Pro's and Con's to both actions.

So think about this for a moment, killing bin laden swiftly, and then pause for a moment and consider the benefits to the world when we took our time and put Saddam Hussein on trial.

I see your ideology behind this but don't you think Sadam was a little different? He was the leader of an entire country and we allowed his people to try him. Osama is just a nobody with a group of followers.

[auslifta]

What would have bin laden rathered?

[RaginCajun]

brought him back home and put him a room with a hungry gator. and of course, choot'em!!!!

[jtuner77]

I would have shot both his knees and elbows for shits and grins but made damn sure his ass was alive to live out the remainder of his life in misery

This is pretty much what I would have done.

[jimmyinkedup]

The only prudent option was to kill him IMO. Wheter he resisted or not.
Think about it - if taken alive there would be upheaval all over the world from extremists.
Terroist threats and international terrorist attacks demanding his releease. It goes on and on.
To be honest even if he was taken alive - the most prudent (albeit wrong) thing to do would be to state he was dead.I dont think this is whatr happened but im just saying....

[Renesis]

I would have taken him alive and set him free in NYC in his boxers.

[68charger]

shot on the spot.

[MR-FQ320]

C) keep him alive to torture him, for like 6 months, REAL slow death, all the sick shit n all.

[songdog]

Shot him.That way his idiots couldnt kidnap anyone for him.

[l2elapse]

1 butllet,1 fatality

[BgMc31]

Shot, we don't need for him to be alive to energize his base. Him being dead and dumped into the sea diminshes his ability to be a martyr.

[Flagg]

Taking him alive does nothing except give him yet, another platform to rant on, plus the cost of the trial would have been astronomical.

Bullet between the eyes, so much quicker and cheaper.

[quarry206]

kill him.. he has done enough that his death would have come anyways

keeping him alive would have caused alot of problems and lead to many many many more deaths because of attacks for his release and or payback..

[dec11]

shot dead, but after a Belfast 6 pack

[JJ78]

Why wouldnt they take him alive? All of the info he supposedly has? There are dudes in Guantanimo and many other prisons around the world that are not going to stand trial? Why would we try him?

If he was the great mastermind that we say he was, wouldnt we want all of his info?

[quarry206]

Why wouldnt they take him alive? All of the info he supposedly has? There are dudes in Guantanimo and many other prisons around the world that are not going to stand trial? Why would we try him?

If he was the great mastermind that we say he was, wouldnt we want all of his info?

sometimes the moral/status victory of destroying your enemy has more pull in the arena of public opinion both for and against you than keeping somebody as a prisoner.. as a prisoner they can become even larger, because they can have rights and gain more of a voice than in hiding..

but killing the one man thought to be un-findable is a loud scream to the world...

[redz]

I would have locked him up ina dungeon and let dsm have fun with him.

[DSM4Life]

I would have locked him up ina dungeon and let dsm have fun with him.

Welcome to my fun house

[marcus300]

DSM, is that you and Shol'va?

[DSM4Life]

DSM, is that you and Shol'va?

We were playing monkey see monkey do.

[dec11]

We were playing monkey see monkey do.

followed by spank the monkey

[jbm]

i would shot him 1 liter of stanozol!

[firmechicano831]

Shot him with no questions asked?