Equipoise question

**bd50** · 09-12-2004, 08:32 PM

what's up everyone,,, can anyone tell me from experience if EQ shuts your test levels down as much as say deca does? i've had my share of deca d**k and want to plan my next cycle correctly.

would it be safe to use EQ at 200-300mg/week for say 10-12 weeks, without having to use "test as a base"? when i say safe i mean without the risk of limp dik..
or is everyone going to flame me as say "you always need test!"

i ask bc i've never done EQ before.

thanks alooooot in advance!

**Iowa** · 09-12-2004, 08:36 PM

eq at that dosage is a waste IMO. Ive never had eq shut me down before, but ive always ran it with test.

Eq also takes a while to kick in, so I would personally run it with some test prop. Id run the eq at 400 mg/week and test at 500mg/week, but split the prop up into daily injections. You could do the eq once a week, but I prefer to do it twice a week.

**Iowa** · 09-12-2004, 08:37 PM

and as far as supressiveness goes. deca is way more supressive at the same dosages IMO

**spooledup** · 09-13-2004, 12:02 AM

I use EQ as a base and don't use test. Works great.

My sex drive doesn't change much at all. No bloat either.

**Spoon** · 09-13-2004, 12:07 AM

use around 400mg/wk nothing less. Also i am a beleiver in "always use test as a base". good luck.

**GetPumped** · 09-13-2004, 12:12 AM

I would add some kind of test. Also, EQ takes longer to kick in than deca , so I would run it for at minimal 10 weeks (12 weeks would be better) at 400mg/week at the least. If you don 200-300mg/week you will just be wasting your money and time. Also, in my experience, deca is WAY more supressive than EQ, even at a lower dose.