Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 41 to 51 of 51
  1. #41
    partyboynyc is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    5,136

    i think

    you should read some of mine, MikeXXL's and Bask8case's recent posts on lowdose cycling.when you done and still not a believer, go check out the three of us in the members picture section. more is not more always when it comes to drugs, but more intelliegent cycling is. not discrediting your desire to use more, but think about it

  2. #42
    PT's Avatar
    PT
    PT is offline DUNAMIS ~ AR-Elite Hall of Famer~
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    12,158
    i know, ive tried everything possible. it just seems to only effect me in high quanaties. ive been cycliny for a long time and 500mgs used to do wonders for me. it sucks needing that much but any less i dont grow very fast.

  3. #43
    partyboynyc is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    5,136
    Quote Originally Posted by pietro75
    i know, ive tried everything possible. it just seems to only effect me in high quanaties. ive been cycliny for a long time and 500mgs used to do wonders for me. it sucks needing that much but any less i dont grow very fast.
    oh no i was talking to joeyjuice!!

  4. #44
    PT's Avatar
    PT
    PT is offline DUNAMIS ~ AR-Elite Hall of Famer~
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    12,158
    im gonna throw this in because i know that someone will ask. i eat (and drink) about 5000 calories a day and 350-450grams of protein. also i shoot 10ius of insulin 6 days a week twice a day.

  5. #45
    mass junkie's Avatar
    mass junkie is offline banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    on the net
    Posts
    8,835
    Quote Originally Posted by partyboynyc
    have run 1500mgs a week and 1000mgs a week. not much difference for me personally except for the sides
    Same here bro

  6. #46
    PT's Avatar
    PT
    PT is offline DUNAMIS ~ AR-Elite Hall of Famer~
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    12,158
    sorry dude i was just getting critisized for sleeping with to many girls in the lounge so just figured it was happening again.

  7. #47
    partyboynyc is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    5,136

    bro

    Quote Originally Posted by pietro75
    sorry dude i was just getting critisized for sleeping with to many girls in the lounge so just figured it was happening again.
    story of my life.....

  8. #48
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Holland
    Posts
    841
    Quote Originally Posted by joevette
    This is not really correct. Metabolites of different AAS do get stored in fat cells, but they are useless once released. The big problem with fat and aromatizing AAS is that fat containes the aromatase enzyme. The more fat you have the more aromatase and when combined with certain AAS the more estrogen you get. This can be remedied easily with an AI.
    where did you get that info?
    Aromatase isn't equivalent to estrogenic activity...!
    I agree that people who are genetically prone to be fat OFTEN have higher natural estrogenic activity... But that is not always the case...
    Believe it or not but Estrogens can actually help you lose fat!!
    (Alpha-receptor mediated!!)...
    Also adipose tissue isn't a protein-dense area and so I don't get the statement about Fat containing Aromatase MUCH LESS STORE IT!!
    (Also you can not say Aromatase Enzyme!! -> the -Ase at the end, indicates that we are talking about an enzyme)

    Greets
    Kingofmasters

  9. #49
    joevette's Avatar
    joevette is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    2,084
    Quote Originally Posted by kingofmasters
    where did you get that info?
    Aromatase isn't equivalent to estrogenic activity...!
    I agree that people who are genetically prone to be fat OFTEN have higher natural estrogenic activity... But that is not always the case...
    Believe it or not but Estrogens can actually help you lose fat!!
    (Alpha-receptor mediated!!)...
    Also adipose tissue isn't a protein-dense area and so I don't get the statement about Fat containing Aromatase MUCH LESS STORE IT!!
    (Also you can not say Aromatase Enzyme!! -> the -Ase at the end, indicates that we are talking about an enzyme)

    Greets
    Kingofmasters

    I'm not sure where I read it, but I was under the impression that aromatase was produced or stored in adipose tissue. Where is it stored/produced?

  10. #50
    joevette's Avatar
    joevette is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    2,084
    Also, how can estrogen help you lose fat?

  11. #51
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Holland
    Posts
    841
    Quote Originally Posted by joevette
    I'm not sure where I read it, but I was under the impression that aromatase was produced or stored in adipose tissue. Where is it stored/produced?
    Production is in all kinds of tissues, primarily fat tissue or Tumor tissue (necrosis-factor dependant) but more fat tissue doesn't mean more aromatase and more aromatase doesn't mean more Estrogenic activity...

    http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/losefatnow4.htm

    Read the story about estrogens (I don't agree with a lot of the described since it doesn't significantly promote fat loss like the GH-increase by estrogens but he has some good points mainly about appetite inducing, but he also missed the fact that Estrogens can have some effects on Alpha2 receptors to promote fat loss just like Yohimbine)

    Greets
    Kingofmasters

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •