new han kuk RSOC dry sus??

**ChefJ** · 11-02-2004, 11:50 AM

I have in my hand a 20ml bottle instead of the old 30ml bottle, of han kuk red star chemical it also says sustanon -dry lot HN1 exp 02/06 mixed testosterones 250mg/ml x 20 ml. made in korea- export only. This is what the bottle says I would post a picture but my girl has my camera. Is this stuff legit it has a boue top?? Thanks for your input

**ChefJ** · 11-02-2004, 12:19 PM

anyone in this forum??????????

**Jackman** · 11-02-2004, 12:22 PM

try the fake steroid forum.

**ChefJ** · 11-02-2004, 01:36 PM

Originally Posted by Jackman

try the fake steroid forum.

I have used his product before with great results. My gear guy is at the top of the chain I was just looking for the common mans view of this stuff

**Jackman** · 11-02-2004, 01:39 PM

Originally Posted by ChefJ

I have used his product before with great results. My gear guy is at the top of the chain I was just looking for the common mans view of this stuff

your gear? common mans views?

**Jackman** · 11-02-2004, 01:41 PM

maybe im confused here but you have used it before with great results.... and "your" gear is at the chain but you dont know if its real?

**ChefJ** · 11-02-2004, 01:51 PM

different bottle 20ml now it was 30ml before and I have the primo from the same company different label it is shown in the pictures forum. Just injected an hour ago and I can feel the ba already. Just looking for some feed back. The dry sus I had before had a picture of an arm flexing in red the first time this one is just a cheap looking white label that says han kuk red star made in korea blah blah blah. Thanks for looking out but I need some lab tests or results or something. In 12 weeks I will give you mine but I will also be making some home brew fina in the next couple of days and I am sure that will reflect the out come.

**Jackman** · 11-02-2004, 01:55 PM

sorry can't help yea if it is real i hear red star is good stuff.

**Property of Steroid.com** · 11-02-2004, 03:04 PM

I'm a common man. My view is that RedStar sucks.

**LILLEN** · 11-02-2004, 03:11 PM

han kuk

Meaning in swedish: Male cock/dick

well sorry..

for the OT

**Dimes** · 11-02-2004, 04:00 PM

Send it to me and I will let you know the results, if its good you can then order again and use it,

**ChefJ** · 11-02-2004, 04:10 PM

Originally Posted by hooker

I'm a common man. My view is that RedStar sucks.

you are but 2 months older than I yet you seem to know everything is it possible that you have tried every product from every lab including every ug lab out there at 26 years of age I doubt it. I am not looking for heresay views from people who take here say from others and repeat it like they know. I again am looking for someones views that have actually held the vial in their hands and tried it.

**Property of Steroid.com** · 11-02-2004, 04:16 PM

I've seen 3 lab reports on Redstar and they all sucked.

Lab Tests = Objective
Personal Results = Subjective

Go to www.t-mag.net and you'll see that RedStar (then Called GAC) was passing off Tren as Masteron ...

now go to www.bodybuilding4life.com and you'll see RedStar had primo with no active ingredients in it...

now go to www.synergymuscle.com and you'll see RedStar has another underdosed product.

Why is my age relevant?

**ChefJ** · 11-02-2004, 04:17 PM

Originally Posted by hooker

I've seen 3 lab reports on Redstar and they all sucked.

Lab Tests = Objective
Personal Results = Subjective

Why is my age relevant?

In this game age=experience experience is what I asked for where are these lab results are they tied to any pictures or exp dates lot numbers etc.?

**Property of Steroid.com** · 11-02-2004, 04:23 PM

Go to www.t-mag.net and you'll see that RedStar (then Called GAC) was passing off Tren as Masteron ...

now go to www.bodybuilding4life.com and you'll see RedStar had primo with no active ingredients in it...

now go to www.synergymuscle.com and you'll see RedStar has another underdosed product.

Why give him the benefit of the doubt that this batch will be good when 3 other batches were rubbish? WHy bother with RedStar?

**Jackman** · 11-02-2004, 04:49 PM

Originally Posted by ChefJ

In this game age=experience experience is what I asked for where are these lab results are they tied to any pictures or exp dates lot numbers etc.?

lol why you so in denial with there products if he presented proof right in front of your face

**ChefJ** · 11-02-2004, 05:33 PM

Originally Posted by Jackman

lol why you so in denial with there products if he presented proof right in front of your face

proof what proof I just spent the last 2 hours trying to find the lab results all I could find was a bunch of heresay and people dogging out proline and phil and everything that has to do with rsoc NOT ONE PERSON HAD FACTUAL EVIDENCE that their product was bunk. I do alot of background research if I have not yet tried a product. Which is why I am doing this.

**Property of Steroid.com** · 11-02-2004, 06:52 PM

It took you 2 hours to find this:

http://www.bodybuilding4life.com/for...ead.php?t=1843

????????????????????????

It was hidden...in the lab tests forum...in the "RedStar" thread...

This test of RedStar shows 0 active ingredients in their primo.

**ChefJ** · 11-02-2004, 09:19 PM

Originally Posted by hooker

It took you 2 hours to find this:

http://www.bodybuilding4life.com/for...ead.php?t=1843

????????????????????????

It was hidden...in the lab tests forum...in the "RedStar" thread...

This test of RedStar shows 0 active ingredients in their primo.

I printed the report and if it was true it was very bad BUT and a very big BUT is the lot number that was subject to testing was ME1A The lot number I possess is OP3A That is all I have to say other than the test was reported 7/04/03 which is well over a year ago.

**Jackman** · 11-02-2004, 10:27 PM

Originally Posted by ChefJ

I printed the report and if it was true it was very bad BUT and a very big BUT is the lot number that was subject to testing was ME1A The lot number I possess is OP3A That is all I have to say other than the test was reported 7/04/03 which is well over a year ago.

the norm with UG labs is start off good and then slack, not other way around.