Results 1 to 11 of 11
-
07-30-2005, 10:00 PM #1
Trenbolone profile contradicition??
Hey fella's.
I was searching the net for some more info on tren ace, just because I was bored
I came across another popular web site which had a profile on tren ace. To
my confusion, it gave a profile which at times is totally backwards and opposite to the informaiton given on this forum and also in the steroid porfiles on steroid.com.
This is the link to that profile:
http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/catfinaplix.htm
It says tren is a safe and mild compound that is best used as a stand alone drug becasue of its progestagenic effects. It says by stacking it with an aromatising compound like test, it would only amplify the bad points like bloat, fat gain, gyno, etc....which does seem to make a good point in my limited knowledge.
Can someone offer an explanation for some of these contradicitons? I know this forum is a strong beleiver in test being a base for any cycle, I just want to know if this guy makes scientific sense.Last edited by RoidGut; 07-30-2005 at 10:02 PM.
-
07-30-2005, 10:04 PM #2
btw, please don't misinterpret my intentions...I don't mean to contradict the recomendations ppl in this forum give becasue I know their information comes from actual experience.
I was just surprised becasue this guy (calling himself "Big Cat") is supposedly a steroid guru.
-
07-30-2005, 10:10 PM #3Associate Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2001
- Posts
- 370
no it is wrong tren is about as strong as it gets tren will lean you out and burn fat ie thats why they use it for cows. cows also get there best gain when given test and a lot of E now for people we dont want a lot of E as it ****s you up but you need some so tren plus d-bol great gains tren test and drol even better gains but never done the later.
-
07-30-2005, 10:16 PM #4Originally Posted by block
I am more concerned with his claims that it is a stand alone drug. I am really looking for anyone that may have a research article on effects of stacking tren with aromatizing compounds. I am an engineer...I love to read anal rententive articles with lots of data. hehehehe
-
07-30-2005, 10:16 PM #5Anabolic Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2004
- Posts
- 2,060
On a mg for mg basis, tren is 3 times more powderful then test. That said, I think it's pretty damn powerful. I think that with progestin activity would shit you down fast and hard, without test you will have no sex drive. B6 helps control progestin levels, as does dostinx. Perhaps the profile you read was from an authors point of view and not feed back from other bb's in the trenches.
-
07-31-2005, 04:31 AM #6Junior Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Posts
- 77
The profile by Bigcat is an old one.At the time it was pretty much right.As we advance in the steroid world of research and info we have come to what we know today.Who know's,within the next ten years we might find something new on any of the compounds used today.
-
07-31-2005, 04:46 AM #7
-
07-31-2005, 07:11 AM #8Writer
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 1,733
Originally Posted by ODC0717
I think that with progestin activity would shit you down fast and hard, without test you will have no sex drive.
Originally Posted by He-man
Originally Posted by RoidGut
Originally Posted by RoidGut
The internet is a game of follow the leader, with regards to AAS information. Currently, Steroid .com is that leader.
-
-
07-31-2005, 07:52 AM #10Originally Posted by gsxxr
-
Originally Posted by BigGuns101
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Zebol 50 - deca?
12-10-2024, 07:18 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS