Eq vs. Deca

**onehundredk** · 04-02-2006, 02:40 PM

So I'm confused...I always thought EQ was a good cutter, because it holds no water weight. and Deca is a good bulker, cuz it holds alot of water retention..or does it? From information I read on this, I'm curious to eq vs. deca.

Procollagen III is a primary indicator used to determine the rate of collagen syn.
Deca @ 3 mg/kg a week(about 270 mg/wk for a 200 lb male) will increase procollagen III levels by 270% by week 2. As you can see, deca is a very good drug at giving you everything you want -- an increase in collagen syn, an increase in skeletal muscle, and increases in bone mass and density.

Equipoise @ 3 mg/kg will increase procollagen III by approximately 340% -- slightly better than deca

Half LIFE
Deca: 15 days
Equipoise : 14 days

Seeing how both chemicals have similar effects. I wonder if EQ could be used as a sucessful bulker. deca giving you 270% increase by week2, and eq giving 340% (by week 2?)...

Source;The Iron Man
Anabolic Phases Explained.

**Alex2** · 04-02-2006, 02:51 PM

I'm also interested to know.

I'm not sure if deca holds a lot of water. I used it in one cycle and didn't get water retention from it and I haven't used EQ at all so I cannot really compare them.

**onehundredk** · 04-02-2006, 02:52 PM

Originally Posted by Alex2

I'm also interested to know.

I'm not sure if deca holds a lot of water. I used it in one cycle and didn't get water retention from it and I haven't used EQ at all so I cannot really compare them.

I didnt really notice alot of water retention either. But I've been told by several people it does.

**Alex2** · 04-02-2006, 02:57 PM

It would be very interesting to hear from some one who ran both.

**Pump101** · 04-02-2006, 03:13 PM

i've ran both, not sure what your question is.. but i'll attempt to answer

**FullMoonHowlingWolf** · 04-02-2006, 03:17 PM

I feel both Deca and EQ are excellent. When using Deca I hold some water, but noticeably less when using EQ. I've run both with good results. The gains come a bit slower, but are quality gains.

**powerliftmike** · 04-02-2006, 03:24 PM

I know people like to compare deca and eq, but there are different drugs. One advantage to EQ is that its not 19nor like deca, so its more of a suppression that total HPTA shutdown.

**onehundredk** · 04-02-2006, 04:48 PM

Originally Posted by powerliftmike

I know people like to compare deca and eq, but there are different drugs. One advantage to EQ is that its not 19nor like deca, so its more of a suppression that total HPTA shutdown.

well yes, deca you need to get your anti estrogens and pct. with eq you dont. the question is, if they are simiallar effects. instead of running the common deca as a bulker. could eq be ran?

**Angelus** · 04-02-2006, 05:33 PM

I like Eq better for both for cutting is great as long as you stay on diet and for bulking combined with something else is great becouse of the HUGE increase in apetite

**onehundredk** · 04-02-2006, 05:45 PM

Originally Posted by Angelus

I like Eq better for both for cutting is great as long as you stay on diet and for bulking combined with something else is great becouse of the HUGE increase in apetite

besides testosterone , what would you add to this?