Good or bad cycle ?

**The Old Frenchy** · 11-16-2007, 02:47 AM

Hi guys
2 of my friends are on 250mg of sust and 100mg of deca since 1990! They are big and very muscular, no gyno, no high blood pressure, no cholesterol, just a little acne. What do you think of this light and long cycle ?
Thanks !

**kewkewkrazy** · 11-16-2007, 03:07 AM

been on 17 years non stop.....geez they must be rich

**Booz** · 11-16-2007, 03:21 AM

Originally Posted by kewkewkrazy

been on 17 years non stop.....geez they must be rich

not really quite the opposite actually,running that small a dose wouldnt cost you much at all..............

**ChuckLee** · 11-16-2007, 03:33 AM

Agree with Booz.
But could this idea be so wrong? I've never heard anything similar but it sounds like negative effects at those dosages won't come out and natty test wouldn't be afflicted IMO. What do you really think experieced guys?

For the threadstarter: you also know the gains they have reached in 17 years?
CL

**The Old Frenchy** · 11-16-2007, 03:37 AM

Money seems not to be a problem for my friends, youn are right. Maybe it's the best way to take roids, long and light cycle ... ?

**The Old Frenchy** · 11-16-2007, 03:42 AM

They add near 30 pounds of lean muscle. They are 43 and ... 61 years old ! And I can tell you that this old dude is muscular as hell...

**ChuckLee** · 11-16-2007, 03:45 AM

17 years of non-stop gears and 30 pounds doesn't seem a great deal...
1.75 lbs/year less or more. You could put on at least 4 lbs/year of lbm with normal on/off periods IMO.
CL

**The Old Frenchy** · 11-16-2007, 03:50 AM

Ok that's all I wanted to know before starting a cycle, but the most interesting think I believe, is that they got NO side effets. No clomid, no nolva etc ....