half lives and injection site????

[mclovin009]

hey guys another thread on here sparked this question. i am curiouse if injection location makes any type of difference. more specificly, related to the half life of of the substances. i remember reading in a ebook that you have to double the half lives of anabolics if you inject them into larger muscles, such as glute and quad aposed to smaller muscles like tris, bis, and delts?????????

[Rando911]

I Doubt it.

[shifty_git]

I think that therory was dismissed ages ago...

[juicenchris2989]

I think that therory was dismissed ages ago...

agree

[Haro3]

use search button....? there is some theory behind it and i've experienced what i might consider site growth from injections but not positive all in all i'd say no it doesnt do much besides make the smaller muscles on ur body hurt like hell cuz they dont like the amount of fluid ur puttin in them

[mclovin009]

thats what i thought and have heard on other boards. just curiouse what your opinion was

[meathead320]

I think the idea is that in a muscle that is more dense, the substance, oil based, or water based, either way takes more time to be absorbed.

However, I don't that that has been proven.

There would have to be a study done on about 10,000 bodybuilders, all with very carefully controled setting, legal allowance to use such drugs for the tests, and then timing and blood tests etc...

And even then the result of difference would likely not be a lot, like maybe extend or shorten the half-lives by say 10-20%.

Same thing with deep vs. shallow injects.

My thoery has always been, if it is in the muscle 1/2", it is in the muscle, and will be absorbed no different than 1" or 1.5" in the muscle. So long as you dont stick it in fat, it will effect you about the same.

Someone care to prove me wrong, I am willing to learn, but it would be hard to "prove".

I think some of the anecdotal stuff is really just in guys heads too.