Results 1 to 5 of 5
Thread: Ester question, wrecking my head
-
07-24-2008, 08:17 AM #1
Ester question, wrecking my head
I had a quick discussion the other day about why one can expect more gains using long estered testosterones vs propionate .
I was told that it was to do with the test lvl's peeking at a double rate when the long ester finally gets going (after 5-7 weeks, what ever) though i can't imagine that test levels rise like so quickly using a long ester, i always thought you get a bigger spike using prop. I also believe that you get alot stable blood lvl's using a long ester version.
I remember looking at this blood hormone chart that was long ester vs short ester - which proves my point. Was searching all day so i could rub his nose into itbut with no luck.
If anyone came across is or know where it is can you drop a link.
Also can someone settle my argument on this topic?
Thanks for an informative answer in advance. A nice link to a study or something like that would be nice too.
-
07-24-2008, 01:49 PM #2
Anyone
-
07-24-2008, 05:36 PM #3
prop every day beats long ester 2xweek
long ester 2xweek beats prop eod
-
07-24-2008, 05:53 PM #4
if you shoot prop ed you will get stable levels pretty quickly. the only thing that would make bigger gains is a larger dose or not accounting for water retention
-
07-24-2008, 06:54 PM #5
the free-test rollercoaster is only dictated by how frequently, or infrequently, you inject. Im kinda having a hard time understanding what you are asking. The problem with looking at studies for test that include blood levels is that they are rarely done sensibly. The main test e study is test e injected once a week, others are similar. I cant find any on prop but i would imagine they dont do ed or eod injects.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
So far so good, they seem to be doing what they’re supposed to.
Expired dbol (blue hearts)