Results 1 to 40 of 40
Thread: who has done higher bf% cycles
-
03-29-2009, 04:22 PM #1
who has done higher bf% cycles
im talkin like 18+ bf% ???
if you could take the time and right down what bf% you started at , gear used, sides (if any ) this would be great !!!!!
i know most say you shouldnt coz of higher chance of sides etc but ive had some buddies do test cycles with dbol frontload etc starting around 20% and made good clean 10-15kg gains and came down to 16 -17% bf after cycle with no extra sides , this got me thinking , i realise a good clean diet helps as in these cases they did so ..
yeah cheers fellas look forward to reading replies
-
Sorry not here, its just to dumb..
-
03-29-2009, 04:36 PM #3
-
03-29-2009, 05:11 PM #4Associate Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Posts
- 213
I've always been higher BF,no matter how I ate, or how much cardio I did. The first test cycle I did, I would say I was about 22%. It was great. I got super strong, I could see muscle's popping out under the fat. I had absolutly no sides at all. blood pressure fine, no sign of gyno. I am on my third cycle now, I am down to about 16-17%. The biggest, strongest and littlest bf that I have ever been. The gear on top of being what it is was a total mental boost to continue to eat, train, and rest like I should be.
I have heard of the negative issues wih high bf. But I can honestly say that any of them affected me in the least bit. Agan, thats just me...
-
-
03-29-2009, 05:27 PM #6
-
-
03-29-2009, 05:31 PM #8
I didnt give him advice, he asked for peoples experiences - I gave him mine. READ.
Just because it may not work for you doesnt mean others havent had success with it.
-
-
-
Like i said above, he is repeating your mistake. Doing cycles with high BF is a mistake no matter how you slice it.
I would bet my house that if i asked this guys to list his diet/macro/routine you would laugh. I been here long enough to know that and in time so will you.
-
03-29-2009, 05:35 PM #12
-
03-29-2009, 05:46 PM #13
I am 20% BF ... On Test P 75 mgs ED ... and NPP 50 mgs ED. So you are saying I am dumb??
I agree... but... LOOK AT POWERLIFTERS THAT ARE ON CYCLE... THEY CERTAINLY AINT NO 12% BF !!! THEY USE AAS TO BE ABLE TO SQUAT A HALF TON AND BENCH A QUARTER TON AND DEADLIFT SOMEWHERE IN THE MIDDLE.
LIKE i said a million times... it is case dependent. I agree that you are better off waiting til you get to a lower BF ... BUT YOU WILL NOT DROP DEAD IF YOU DONT FOLLOW THOSE GUIDELINES
HIGHLY UNLIKELY !!!! NO ONE WILL DROP DEAD FROM HIGHBLOOD PRESSURE AT 18% BF WHILE CYCLING.. SORRY NOPE AINT GONNA HAPPEN. I have cycled at 26% before when I was stupid and I have been as low as 12% BF ... yes they are easier on you and less sides if your BF isnt skyrocketed but YOU WILL NOT DROP DEAD... I REPEAT WILL NOT DROP DEAD FROM USING AAS WITH A BF % BETWEEN 18-20% ... somewhere in the 30% range... yah I could possibly see that happening with someone... but seriously come on.
I feel fine... and I am higher than I'd like to be but I am not WORRIED ABOUT DEATH from MY CYCLE. That's just absurd !! I monitor my blood pressure and have blood work done regularly. I know the risks but I am not going to stop doing what I love because of a number that the tape measure reads... PLUS I AM ON TRT !!! AND PEOPLE ARE ON TRT WITH HIGH BF% AND the docs when prescribing it don't go OH YOU ARE OVER SO AND SO BODY FAT WE CANT GIVE THIS TO YOU !!!
AHH THIS TOPIC GETS ME SO FUMED !!!
-
03-29-2009, 05:53 PM #14
-
Am i saying your dumb ? No, what i am saying is your not going to get all the benefits of the cycle .
My question to is why didnt you drop your bf down to say 12-13% before hand ? Was it because you were lazy ? or maybe lacking the knowledge to get that low ?
The only point of this question is for this guy to justify doing a cycle when he's been told time and time again not to do it at high bf.
Read between the lines people.
-
03-29-2009, 05:53 PM #16
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Location
- Scylla and Charybdis
- Posts
- 15,474
- Blog Entries
- 1
^well look you're probably not going to die if you cycle with a higher bf,
but I think the point is that isn't the type of advice that is usually given on this board (or any board that I know of)
-
First he said his bf was 18%+, which could mean he's 20%, or it could mean he's 30%. Second you ask if you are dumb, well imo yes you are, if you cant reduce your bf% with exercise and diet then somethings wrong.. Your right, chances are he wont drop dead at 18% gut at 15% ive had high blood pressure issues...
-
03-29-2009, 06:06 PM #18
Ok yes... I agree with you fully. I know I will not see the results I should see but if you knew my story you might understand a lil better... maybe not agree with why i did what i am doing but at least you could see where I am coming from bro.
Was I too lazy to get down to 12-13% .. yes I guess you could say that.. not entirely... IMPATIENT was more the word I want to use here. The docs put me on TRT 200 mgs EW. and well I havent been on cycle for 2 years... I was up at 36-38% BF after a bad car accident... coma... wheelchair bound for 6 months... Got myself down to 22% BF in just a lil under a year when I was prescribed the TRT and I WAS JUST LIKE YA KNOW WHAT... FVCK IT !! I am just going to cycle anyways ... it wont hurt anything.. yah Imight not see the gains I would if I was lower in BODYFAT but I thought WHY NOT !!?? So after 4 weeks at 200mgs of CYP ... I transferred to my 75mgs ED of Prop and 50 mgs ED of NPP... sorta like a cutter cycle... my diet is strict as hell. I am dropping body fat and gaining muscle and starting to look great again for the first time in over 3 years. I hit a major depression era after the accident. I hated myself. I worked through it. Toughed it out. And now here I am ... 229lbs. 20.39% BF and dropping. When I was hit on my Motorcycle I was 248lbs. 13% BF... after my 7th legit serious cycle. When I started Lifting at 17 I was 155lbs. Did my 1st cycle at 22 when I weighed 195LBS. I was young and dumb... but I was gaining and frankly I was a MONSTER.... and after the wreck I just felt horrible.... absolutely horrible.... I am just happy to be back at it.. I feel that even though MY BODYFAT is high I will perservere and overcome and I know I will get the results I want and NEED from this to completely turn myself around. That's My take on the whole thing and I KNOW THERE ARE PEOPLE OUT THERE THAT DISAGREE WITH MY CHOICES BUT honestly... I don't care. I am happy... and it has been a long time since I can say I have been really happy. Whether its the AAS or not well... time will tell.
*** ALSO I DO NOT CODONE OR AM I IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM TELLING SOMEONE TO FOLLOW MY LEAD AND DO EXACTLY AS I DO. I AM A BELIEVER THAT YOU NEED TO HAVE A LOWER BODYFAT BEFORE YOU BEGIN CYCLING.. I GUESS I AM MORE OF A WEAK MINDED INDIVIDUAL ... BUT TO EACH THEIR OWN. ***
Thanks for listening
Sorry didn't mean to create a unsettling debate man.. my apologies and you are right.. people shouldnt cycle at a high bf %.
-
03-29-2009, 06:11 PM #19
I appreciate your opinion... In fact I think i am dumb also that I didnt have enough will power to wait.. but to bring myself from 303 36%Bf down to 215 23%Bf I dunno I just kinda... felt like I did a lot of work and as u see from my post above... i have a hard and troubled past like i am sure a lot of you have. YES I SHOULD HAVE WAITED ... BUT !!! I am trying to be as safe as I can on cycle knowing I have a high BF%... I am also on a BP med to regulate my BP cuz I know it is going to go up some... I feel safe and secure but you are absolutely 100% right....
We dont know about this guy... so its right to tell him not to cycle...
SO DUDE WHO STARTED THIS THREAD... DROP SOME BF .... Then cycle.
-
-
03-29-2009, 06:51 PM #21
yes my 1st cycle but no im not searching 4 one and no my bf % is not 18% , dont assume ask !!!
as i wrote i was simply curious and asking as my mates had done higher bf% cycles
you are 100% correct here
and no i wasnt clearly searching 4 a cycle i already have mine laid out and will be starting soon , thanks 4 your concern about high blood pressure
now if everyone chills the fark out as i originally posted i said i am well aware of the sides that come with doing higher bf% cycles , "however" my mates (3) have all done higher bf% cycles 20+% and no probs i was just seeing what other ppls experiences were , you have all gone way over board !!!!
i appreciate the concern in sides to higher bf% cycles and although i already know this im sure this is why some of you wrote what u did , in saying this i was just asking for experiences etc ,
thanks anyways fellas
-
03-29-2009, 06:56 PM #22
you are way off the mark here READ my post again !!!!! i dont need to justify myself to you or any 1 else on this board or others , thats a fact , however im not any where near stupid enough to just pop a pill stick a feww cc of what ever i get my hands run no pct and say im a genius , as i wrote in 1st post "again" i was referring to my mates who have done it i have not said i want to , and i did mention im aware of the sides of running higher bf% cycles , honestly
-
03-29-2009, 06:59 PM #23Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Posts
- 657
If your goal is to drop body fat , it would be wise to learn how to do it naturally.
IMO , someone who has 18% body fat weighing 260lbs is much more qualified in my book to run a cycle than say someone who is 10% BF and weighs 160lbs.
Main point, depends on how much muscle you have gained.
-
03-29-2009, 07:03 PM #24
1st i didnt say i was any bf% !!!!!!!!!!
i asked who has done a cycle with bf% higher than this amount !!!!!!!!
read ppl read !!!!!!!!!!!!
this whole thread ppl have just assumed im referring to myself ( which is clear i havent -you have just assumed ) , have assumed im looking 4 a cycle ( again i am not !!!) assuming i need to justify myself ( again i do not !!!) and assume they know what im asking the whole question was exactly how the 1st reply was !!!!!!!!!!
i have been around on here long enough , why is it so hard to just post a question and ppl read it 4 what it is rather than thinking i have or other ppl have alterior motives ? by this i mean assuming it was 4 me assuming my bf% etc it absolutely amazes me , dumbfounded is a word that comes to mind about this thread !!!!!!!!!!
-
03-29-2009, 07:17 PM #25
now that weve cleared all that up ....
would any 1 like to post there higher bf% cycles ????? as i am curious ...
no it is not 4 me ,
i am not looking 4 a cycle,
i am not 18% bf ,
i am aware of the higher risk of estrogenic side effects ,
hopefully its clearer now ??????
if any 1 is interested my 1st cycle will be
week 1- 10 test c 400-500mgs
week 1-4 dbol @ 30mg/ed
week 12-16 nolva @ 20mg/ed (also have clomid )
2nd cycle will be
week 1-12 Eq @ 400 mg/ew
week 1-14 test c @ 400-500mg/ew
week 12 - 16 anavar @ 40+mgs/ed
same nolva pct also clomid 100/100/50/50
now im sure youll all have something to say , thats just me going on my 1st post basis .....
i realise the debate over the eq higher dose longer running et c, saying this i could change it to deca at same amount ....
-
03-29-2009, 07:31 PM #26
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Location
- Scylla and Charybdis
- Posts
- 15,474
- Blog Entries
- 1
^what's your bf?
-
03-29-2009, 07:38 PM #27
HERE HERE TO THAT MY BROTHA !!!
And to the guy who started this Thread...
Your first cycle Looks Good. I would personally BEEF that PCT up a bit but you could "GET BY" with just that... better than nothing i guess... throw some clomid (i know u already have it so use it) maybe some aromasin in there and that will be looking much better.
Your second cycle... IMO... You aren't running it long enough and ur dosages wont be high enough to see satisfactory results... EQ 600wk MIN !! for 16 weeks. Not a written in stone thing just kind of an unspoken rule if you wanna see results from such a thing... ya know??
I run it at 1000 per week for 16 weeks... but then again... I do what I want.Last edited by The Deuce; 03-29-2009 at 07:43 PM.
-
03-29-2009, 07:39 PM #28
16 % just doing a clen cycle now 2 0n 2 0ff then i should start my 1st cycle as posted what you think
-
03-29-2009, 07:44 PM #29
-
03-29-2009, 07:53 PM #30
-
03-29-2009, 07:54 PM #31
-
03-29-2009, 07:55 PM #32
second cycle go with the deca , eq sucks JMO
-
03-29-2009, 07:56 PM #33
I did one at around 16-17% and regret it.. Got gyno cause of it.
As much as i like boobs, I wouldn't do it again.
-
-
03-29-2009, 08:06 PM #35
note taken here
will do bro
looks like its heading that way
lol dont mine boobs either the female ones , not the female ones on men !!!!!! im sure they looked great on you lol jokes jokes
cheers mate i appreciate the adult response
-
03-29-2009, 08:07 PM #36
gotta admit i do catch myself staring at them in the mirror HAHA JK!
-
03-29-2009, 08:09 PM #37
as long as you have nolva on hand you shouldnt really even worry about gyno
-
03-29-2009, 08:09 PM #38
-
03-29-2009, 08:11 PM #39Banned
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Location
- R.I.P. T-MOS
- Posts
- 4,944
i started in the mid 20%.... the risks are higher, you need close doc supervision, a good ai and anc. drugs to make sure things go smooth.... i dropped about 10% by the end of cycle... nazi clean diet.... i did sust at 125mg eod and var at 30mg ed
DONT recommend it to those who do not have close doc supervision, bloodwork, etc.....
my rec.. drop the bf before hand...
-
03-29-2009, 08:27 PM #40
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Expired dbol (blue hearts)
01-11-2025, 04:00 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS