Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    CHAP's Avatar
    CHAP is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Carolina's
    Posts
    2,363

    Somebody show me the damn truth!!!

    Okay. I really just wanting to see actual proof . Not opinions. But actual scientific evidence from a clinical study.

    Opinions are fine.LOL

    Okay I hear everyone say test e and c need to be done every 3.5 days but really what is the point.

    The ester is specifically put there so that you DO NOT have to stick yourself all the time.

    I'm wondering is there any study that actually proves that if you take a long ester like this that you will build more muscle, burn more fat ect.(if you were on point with your diet and training)

    PLEASE understand I am not bashing anyone. To each there own .

    I have run cycles with injections every 7 days as well as every 3.5.

    In the end I see no difference except I have gone through 2X as many needles.

  2. #2
    redz's Avatar
    redz is offline Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    GTA
    Posts
    14,260
    Injecting every 3.5 days will keep your blood levels more stable and thus less chance of side effects.

  3. #3
    Vitruvian-Man is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,657
    Quote Originally Posted by redz View Post
    Injecting every 3.5 days will keep your blood levels more stable and thus less chance of side effects.
    ^^ Taking that point a step further. If you're actually trying to create "optimal" blood levels, long-esters should be injected each day as well. This allows for the fewest peaks in test levels... but many do not practice this particular protocol, simply due to inconvenience of the pinning vs. physical results (when compared to injecting E3D)

  4. #4
    arenawarrior is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Gym
    Posts
    358
    yes.. You get the same amount but it dwindles over the length of the week. Its not like its says at the same mg of test then at the end of the week drops down to nothing.

    injecting all at once: ^ peak
    injecting twice a week: ---- Constant

  5. #5
    Vitruvian-Man is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,657
    Quote Originally Posted by arenawarrior View Post
    injecting all at once: ^ peak
    injecting twice a week: ---- Constant
    Not true. Injecting every 3.5 days = two peaks.

    Injecting each day = constant.

  6. #6
    arenawarrior is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Gym
    Posts
    358
    I was talking about him talking about Injecting all at once compared to 3.5 days..
    Since hes doing TestE/C injecting 3.5 is best instead of all at once.. well every day is BEST. but why not do Test P if your doing it every day.

    But your 100% right vitruvian.

  7. #7
    roserose's Avatar
    roserose is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    284
    Go look at the info provided by this site for the androgel . It shows graphs of the rate at which 100mg shot test cyp or e. lowers in the blood. Then you can make up your own mind. If that's not clinical enough do your own research aint doin it for you. Its out there u just haven't looked.

  8. #8
    Vitruvian-Man is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,657
    Quote Originally Posted by arenawarrior View Post
    I was talking about him talking about Injecting all at once compared to 3.5 days..
    Since hes doing TestE/C injecting 3.5 is best instead of all at once.. well every day is BEST. but why not do Test P if your doing it every day.

    But your 100% right vitruvian.
    Thanks bro.

    There are a couple of reasons to shoot long esters ED...

    (IE) if you're on TRT and have a quality supply of human-grade test-cyp... and you want to do your first cycle of Tren (so logically you choose Tren-A).. well rather then shooting the test every 3.5 days as usual, you would just shoot it ED with the tren-A.

    Why trade U.S.A. made pharma-grade test, for 3rd world prop?

    Just an example, but yah.

  9. #9
    arenawarrior is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Gym
    Posts
    358
    not familiar with TRT, Learning new things everyday.. Going to read up on TRT when i get back from work and also look at roserose reference on the charts, i think that would be some interesting reads to see the blood levels. I just read forums to learn more i choose like 10 new topics a in the morning and read and learn =)


    Didnt mean to hyjack more just commenting and learning

  10. #10
    roserose's Avatar
    roserose is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    284
    3rd world prop..LOL that's good.

  11. #11
    MuscleScience's Avatar
    MuscleScience is offline ~AR-Elite-Hall of Famer~
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    ShredVille
    Posts
    12,630
    Blog Entries
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by CHAP View Post
    Okay. I really just wanting to see actual proof . Not opinions. But actual scientific evidence from a clinical study.

    Opinions are fine.LOL

    Okay I hear everyone say test e and c need to be done every 3.5 days but really what is the point.

    The ester is specifically put there so that you DO NOT have to stick yourself all the time.

    I'm wondering is there any study that actually proves that if you take a long ester like this that you will build more muscle, burn more fat ect.(if you were on point with your diet and training)

    PLEASE understand I am not bashing anyone. To each there own .

    I have run cycles with injections every 7 days as well as every 3.5.

    In the end I see no difference except I have gone through 2X as many needles.
    LOL, Its all methodical there really isnt much evidence that that average person has access too that will support this. One can extrapolate hows and whys and all that stuff. I find it rather silly to pin a compound multiple times a week when said compound was specifically designed to be administered a certain amount of times. More than likely said compound was also studied under controlled conditions by people with a lot knowledge in chemistry, medicine, pharm....ect.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •