Eq??

**bigjoe30** · 01-16-2010, 06:43 PM

what is the deal with EQ? i don't hear to many people talking about it, is it good ? what is the best way to use it? cutting or bulking? with?

**E Police 183** · 01-16-2010, 08:06 PM

EQ is going to give you slow lean gains that are easier to keep then with most AAS. However they aren't going to be staggering gains. Your going to want to stack it with test of course, run it from anywhere from 12min-15weeks. 14 weeks is decent and the mgs should be over 500mgs, i like to front load at 1000mgs for the first 2 weeks then bring it down to 600mg-750mgs for the rest of the 14weeks. A lot of people dont like EQ however I am a fan. My current cycle now is Test E/EQ/DBOL /ANDROPEN ...The EQ makes me eat like an animal. But as i said you don't do EQ alone.

**Hazard** · 01-16-2010, 08:09 PM

yep.... seems the jury is 50/50 on EQ. You wont know until your try it..... some guys respond to it..... some don't.....

~Haz~

**gymnerd** · 01-16-2010, 09:02 PM

Some love it some hate it, there seems to be nobody in the middle.

**bigjoe30** · 01-16-2010, 09:16 PM

what's to hate about it? the sides?

**E Police 183** · 01-16-2010, 09:22 PM

It doesn't give a lot of ppl good gains for what they are paying when they can use other products that cost the same or cheaper that give better gains with the same look

**bigjoe30** · 01-16-2010, 09:45 PM

It's actually pretty cheap compared to others

**E Police 183** · 01-16-2010, 10:40 PM

I'm just telling you that most ppl dont seem to like it because they can get better results with other substances. Theres nothing that it does that really makes someone wanna jump to use it. what are your stats and did you plan on using it?

**gymnerd** · 01-17-2010, 09:32 AM

I think if you are looking for the lean, hard, vascular look you will prob love EQ if you just want to pack on as much mass as possible whether it be fat, muscle, bloat whatever something like deca is better. I know alot of people that absolutely HATE deca think its dog piss and EQ is much more quality compound its really an individual thing.

**turborx7s** · 01-17-2010, 09:48 AM

I'm planning on running EQ as well. While the pure 'blow-up' factor is nifty with running Deca , from my research and talks with people, a good portion of it will diminish, running a good PCT or not.

That being said, EQ lacks in potency, but IMO makes up for this with the quality of gains givens.

**marcus300** · 01-17-2010, 10:03 AM

EQ as been beaten to death here, if your interested in building muscle tissue there are far better compounds out there what will achieve this then risking using something like EQ whats got a reputation from experienced BB's of doing nothing. Many people are blinded by what eq can achieve because they are running other comepounds within the stack what are in reality producing the gains and not the EQ.

Why do you think there is so much talk about if it can build muscle or not? because there are many who have reported that it doesnt, so why risk using something what isnt going to build tissue!! use something what is.......
use it on its own and see what it does but remember not everyone responds in the same way so you might just do well from it but if you stack it with test how do you really know what is producing the gains!! best of luck

**gymnerd** · 01-17-2010, 10:20 AM

Originally Posted by marcus300

EQ as been beaten to death here, if your interested in building muscle tissue there are far better compounds out there what will achieve this then risking using something like EQ whats got a reputation from experienced BB's of doing nothing. Many people are blinded by what eq can achieve because they are running other comepounds within the stack what are in reality producing the gains and not the EQ.

Why do you think there is so much talk about if it can build muscle or not? because there are many who have reported that it doesnt, so why risk using something what isnt going to build tissue!! use something what is.......
use it on its own and see what it does but remember not everyone responds in the same way so you might just do well from it but if you stack it with test how do you really know what is producing the gains!! best of luck

I respectfully disagree, I know many competing BB that always use EQ and it will most definatly build quality muscle just not as dramaticly as other compounds but not everyone is interested in dramatic gains. I would rather have slower more consistant gains like with EQ, or Primo than blow up, it isnt as hard on the body and gains are easy to retain as well as PCT is easier with EQ rather than Deca . There is a lot of long time vets who run EQ and love it, I personaly dont really care either way its a tool and has a purpose IMO just like other AAS.

I know you hate the compound Marcus but some love it, I think people have to run to see if its for them or not.

**marcus300** · 01-17-2010, 10:29 AM

Originally Posted by gymnerd

I respectfully disagree, I know many competing BB that always use EQ and it will most definatly build quality muscle just not as dramaticly as other compounds but not everyone is interested in dramatic gains. I would rather have slower more consistant gains like with EQ, or Primo than blow up, it isnt as hard on the body and gains are easy to retain as well as PCT is easier with EQ rather than Deca . There is a lot of long time vets who run EQ and love it, I personaly dont really care either way its a tool and has a purpose IMO just like other AAS.

I know you hate the compound Marcus but some love it, I think people have to run to see if its for them or not.

Ive ran it a few times and many Bodybuilders I know have use it and its only a small select few who like it, like i say many people get confused by the other compounds within the stack, ive ran it on its own and it was a total waste IMHO, its very weak but if you like it and it suits a purpose carry on doing what works for you. There is a reason why some many people ask about its strength all over the boards, thats because the % is not in favour.

My opinion is its a complete waste and there are far better compounds out there what wont be a risk at building muscle, its a debate what no one is going to win unless the guy try's it out, but like ive said he will be probably blinded by the other compound doing all the work anyway.

**gymnerd** · 01-17-2010, 10:32 AM

Originally Posted by marcus300

Ive ran it a few times and many Bodybuilders I know have use it and its only a small select few who like it, like i say many people get confused by the other compounds within the stack, ive ran it on its own and it was a total waste IMHO, its very weak but if you like it and it suits a purpose carry on doing what works for you. There is a reason why some many people ask about its strength all over the boards, thats because the % is not in favour.

My opinion is its a complete waste and there are far better compounds out there what wont be a risk at building muscle, its a debate what no one is going to win unless the guy try's it out, but like ive said he will be probably blinded by the other compound doing all the work anyway.

Fair enough, and I agree.