Results 1 to 23 of 23
Thread: test prop ace
-
02-10-2010, 06:13 PM #1
test prop ace
so after a long time waiting my source finaly got back to me.
he has test e amps and test p amps but he said that the test prop amps are prop acetate?
2 questions pls,
1-whats is acetate? i read that its a shorter ester but does it make the test prop an even shorter ester then it already is?
is the lifespan of test prop acetate still the same as test prop, 3days?
2-which compound should i get? i know the prop will have less water retention and less sides then the en.
im looking for a totally clean bulk, no water retention or 'fat-mass'. is that possible with test en, or stick with the prop?
thx all!!
-
02-10-2010, 06:57 PM #2
anyone??
-
acetate has a slightly smaller ester than prop.
I believe the half life on it is 3 days.
If you're after less water retention, go with the prop or ace.
-
02-10-2010, 07:25 PM #4
-
Anytime, man.
Yah, I prefer pinning short ester ED.
-
02-11-2010, 03:01 AM #6
Acetate is the shortest ester used for AAS (2 carbons) vs 3 carbons for propionate . This puts its half-life at 1.3 days (using # of carbons X .7 formula) and active life at maybe twice that.
There is no such thing as prop ace. It is one or the other.
-
02-11-2010, 03:13 AM #7
yea test ace should produce less bloat...bout to switch over from test p to test a soon myself
-
02-11-2010, 09:57 PM #8
cool thx for the info fellas!!
-
02-11-2010, 10:44 PM #9
-
02-11-2010, 11:24 PM #10
-
02-12-2010, 12:06 AM #11Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Location
- socal
- Posts
- 545
-
02-12-2010, 12:08 AM #12
more stable blood lvls.
-
02-12-2010, 12:13 AM #13
-
02-12-2010, 01:05 AM #14Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Location
- socal
- Posts
- 545
-
02-12-2010, 01:08 AM #15
-
02-12-2010, 01:24 AM #16Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Location
- socal
- Posts
- 545
how though? wouldnt pinning test e be just as stable, if not more because fluctuations in pin time wouldnt have as high an impact. everyone says to pin test p or over test e because short ester has less sides; so wouldnt it make sense to use test a because it is has even shorter half life?
-
02-12-2010, 01:36 AM #17
i know right, what you guys are saying is there will be more bloat than test p because its faster...which makes zero sense...so what you guys are telling me is i should do a blend of test P and test A, instead of running just test A even though im pinning ed? I was planning on just switching over to just Test A because i figured since i was pinning ED might as well use Test A since it will give me less bloat plus id get more test out of it...can someone please chime in here, cause i have a feeling im right
-
02-12-2010, 11:58 PM #18Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Location
- socal
- Posts
- 545
-
02-13-2010, 01:24 AM #19Junior Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2010
- Posts
- 61
Bonaparte makes sense to me: The shorter the ester the quicker you are approaching the half life, so the more spikes you're actually getting. If X and Y both take you from 0 to 10 at 0 hours and then 24 hours later X is at 6 and Y is at 7 then you've got more flucuation to deal with. (X being the shorter of the 2 esters.) So then pinning a long ester ED would keep you at 9 (or maybe even 10 - we're talking a 7+ day half life, but using ED injections.)
No? (This is just what I'm gathering from reading what is being said.)Last edited by taiwanguy; 02-13-2010 at 02:46 AM. Reason: typo
-
02-13-2010, 02:19 AM #20
-
02-13-2010, 02:30 AM #21
so what i should do is make a Test blend of:
Test A: 50mg Test P: 50mg per ML? of maybe 75/25
i could see what your saying about EOD pinning but im pinning ED!!! YOU PIN TREN ACE ED!!! SO WHY CANT I PIN TEST ACE ED?
-
02-13-2010, 12:14 PM #22
-
02-13-2010, 12:46 PM #23
the people i know who have used it have pinned it 2xs a day. whether right or wrong thats what they did. i have never used it.
Moto
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Zebol 50 - deca?
12-10-2024, 07:18 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS