Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    LiftedDuramax2007 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    367

    Just read this thread by Ronnie

    If this is true and this can be done without having issues later on why isnt everyone doing it this way? Other than costs, but alot of us probably could afford to do it this way.
    And why do alot of you still recommend 10-12wks if this way is looked on as great advice? Just trying to get things straight
    http://forums.steroid.com/showthread.php?t=402776

  2. #2
    LiftedDuramax2007 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    367
    bump

    Anyone?

  3. #3
    sonnygll's Avatar
    sonnygll is offline Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    In my house
    Posts
    686
    Ronnie is a smart guy. What he is advocating here is progressive training. That works very well indeed. Progressive training is how you continue to make gains at more advanced levels when you are natural. It can also by applied on cycle for increased gains.

    To simplify, you just continue ratcheting up volume and/or intensity through your cycle, than when you are off cycle you just maintain with a minimal amount of training. It works best with the short cycles. Some people call them "blast cycles".

    Short esters and anadrol would go well with that. I wouldn't advocate it for a first time user, but other than that it's a good way to do it. PCT is easier on the short cycles too.

    My way of doing things has kind of evolved into that over time.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •