Results 1 to 3 of 3
Thread: Just read this thread by Ronnie
-
04-29-2010, 11:15 PM #1
Associate Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2010
- Posts
- 367
Just read this thread by Ronnie
If this is true and this can be done without having issues later on why isnt everyone doing it this way? Other than costs, but alot of us probably could afford to do it this way.
And why do alot of you still recommend 10-12wks if this way is looked on as great advice? Just trying to get things straight
http://forums.steroid.com/showthread.php?t=402776
-
04-30-2010, 11:56 AM #2
Associate Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2010
- Posts
- 367
bump
Anyone?
-
04-30-2010, 12:39 PM #3
Ronnie is a smart guy. What he is advocating here is progressive training. That works very well indeed. Progressive training is how you continue to make gains at more advanced levels when you are natural. It can also by applied on cycle for increased gains.
To simplify, you just continue ratcheting up volume and/or intensity through your cycle, than when you are off cycle you just maintain with a minimal amount of training. It works best with the short cycles. Some people call them "blast cycles".
Short esters and anadrol would go well with that. I wouldn't advocate it for a first time user, but other than that it's a good way to do it. PCT is easier on the short cycles too.
My way of doing things has kind of evolved into that over time.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
So far so good, they seem to be doing what they’re supposed to.
Expired dbol (blue hearts)