-
08-13-2010, 10:48 PM #1Associate Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Location
- The Netherlands
- Posts
- 336
Injectable Dbol, less hars on the liver?
Hi. I know about methandrostanolone injectables in many esterefied forms. So shooting Dbol from many times a week to as little as one or twice a week depending on a lot of personal issues.
But regarding the injectable Dbol and the tablets, which one is the least toxic on the liver? Considering one's taking milke thistle and/or N-acetylcysteine and the dosage and length isn't too over he hill...how toxic is it really?
I always prefer injectable AAS just because of the 17 alpha alkylization of orals, but I guess the injectable Dbol's are also 17AA and have to do a first hand pass of the liver anyway. And how good is Dbol when it comes to cardio? It's good for short bulking until the injectable takes over, but does it kill your cardio like tren does?
-
08-14-2010, 03:30 AM #2
never seen an injectable dbol , i heard its out there though...why would they need 17aa if its an injectable ?? something like winny?
-
08-14-2010, 03:33 AM #3Associate Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
- England
- Posts
- 229
yeah, it'd be less toxic as it'd avoid a first pass through the liver
-
08-14-2010, 11:51 AM #4
did you know injectable dbol is pretty much almost the same compound as eq (with slight modified diff. in structure). the only diff is you dont gain the water weights.... the only inject. drug ive heard that is just as hard on the liver as the oral version is winny. if youre gonna be injecting just use a test compound, its pretty much the same thing.
-
08-14-2010, 04:27 PM #5Associate Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
- England
- Posts
- 229
injectible dbol is dbol in liquid form, its not a different compound than dbol
-
08-14-2010, 05:44 PM #6
Dianabol (methandrostenolone ) is dbol because of its C-17 alkylation. Therefore an injectable dbol would be the exact same thing as oral dbol (much like injectable winstrol and oral winstrol are the exact same things). If you were to remove the C-17 alkylation, it wouldn't be dianabol anymore. The only other modification that makes it different from testosterone is a double bond between carbons 1 and 2. It would still be hard on the liver due to the alkylation.
Though I have heard of people crushing up dbol into an extremely fine powder, mixing it into bacteriostatic water and injecting it. Apparently this was popular among powerlifters once long ago.
-
08-14-2010, 07:30 PM #7Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2010
- Location
- Newark, DE
- Posts
- 577
IMO why go through the added hassle of injecting if you are not getting any benefit from it? The benefit of injectibles is supposed to be that they are not nearly as hard on the liver (with a few noted exceptions). No liver benefit, but you run the risk of injection related issues (hitting a vein, etc.). You may need less when injected is the only thing I could think would be an advantage, but that would depend on the concentration in the solution too.
-
08-15-2010, 01:45 PM #8
oh sorry, you misunderstood me..i know inj. dbol is its own drug and in fact ive used it before...i was just making an comparison that alot of people didnt know. it was abit out of context thought so i can understand the confusion.
-
08-15-2010, 01:48 PM #9
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Expired dbol (blue hearts)
01-11-2025, 04:00 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS