Low Dose, Longer Each Compound OR High Doses, Shorter Time, Alternate Compounds?

[JBascom]

I’ve heard opposing theories on this question, but I would be interested in personal experience from users who have tried both methods.

For a cutting cycle with multiple compounds, assume you begin with equal amounts of each compound.

Is it best to run all compounds together at lower doses for longer periods of time for each, or to run each at higher does and shorter periods but stagger their use. I realize this question is probably compound dependent, but I’m interested in general opinion.

In other words, is it best to “hit” receptors hard and short and alternate different compounds, OR is it best to be more consistently with many compounds for longer periods?

I’m a fairly advanced user (15 cycles). A general example is given below. Which is better?

Cycle #1 (keep all compounds at lower doses longer times)

Weeks 1-12, 500 mg Prop
Weeks 1-12, 250 mg Tren
Weeks 1-12, 300 mg EQ
Weeks 1-12, 300 mg Mast
Weeks 3-12, 2100 mg Winny

OR

Cycle #2 (stagger compounds at higher doses shorter times)

Weeks 1-12, 500 mg Prop
Weeks 1-6, 500 mg Tren
Weeks 1-6, 600 mg EQ
Weeks 7-12, 600 mg Mast
Weeks 7-12, 2100 mg Winny

[D7M]

What are your stats and previous cycles: what cycling methods have worked well for you in the past?

[magic32]

Yeah, we need your info.

But more fundamentally, your question isn't really and either/or. See below:

I’ve heard opposing theories on this question, but I would be interested in personal experience from users who have tried both methods.

For a cutting cycle with multiple compounds, assume you begin with equal amounts of each compound.

Is it best to run all compounds together at lower doses for longer periods of time for each, or to run each at higher does and shorter periods but stagger their use. I realize this question is probably compound dependent, but I’m interested in general opinion.

In other words, is it best to “hit” receptors hard and short and alternate different compounds, OR is it best to be more consistently with many compounds for longer periods?

SHORT CYCLE PHILOSOPY, WHICH IS THE ALTERNATIVE OR DEVIANT FROM TRADITIONALLY LONG/MEDIUM (12-16+ WEEKERS), DOESN'T STATE THAT YOU HAVE TO USE STACKS (MULTIPLE COMPOUNDS). NOR DOES TRADITIONAL CYCLING PROTOCOL DICTATE THAT YOU HAVE TO USE A SINGLE COMPOUND OR STAGGER THEM. SHORT CYCLING HAS SOME CAVEATS AND YOU CAN LOOK UP MARCUS300'S THREAD ON THIS TOPIC FOR DETAILS (REQUIREMENTS, BENEFITS, PROS & CONS), BUT THEY ARE BASICALLY FOR ADVANCED USERS. SO IF YOU'RE A NOVICE THEN YOU SHOULDN'T EVEN BE CONSIDERING THEM YET.

STICK TO THE BASICS FIRST, DON'T TRY TO GO FROM KINDERGARTEN TO COLLEGE. LEARN HOW TO COLOR AND DRAW (COMPOUNDS, PCT, AND HOW TO SHOOT), HOW GET ALONG WITH OTHERS (SHARE AND LEARN FROM THE COMMUNITY), HANG OUT AT LUNCH AND RECESS (DIET & WORKOUT FORUMS AND THE LOUNGE), PICK UP A COUPLE OF DIPLOMAS FROM 8TH & 12TH GRADE, THEN LOOK INTO COLLEGES (SHORT CYCLES), PREFERABLY SOMEWHERE WARM WITH LOTS OF BIKINIS.

BEST TO YOU.


I’m a fairly advanced user (15 cycles). A general example is given below. Which is better?

Cycle #1 (keep all compounds at lower doses longer times)

Weeks 1-12, 500 mg Prop
Weeks 1-12, 250 mg Tren
Weeks 1-12, 300 mg EQ
Weeks 1-12, 300 mg Mast
Weeks 3-12, 2100 mg Winny

OR

Cycle #2 (stagger compounds at higher doses shorter times)

Weeks 1-12, 500 mg Prop
Weeks 1-6, 500 mg Tren
Weeks 1-6, 600 mg EQ
Weeks 7-12, 600 mg Mast
Weeks 7-12, 2100 mg Winny