Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: 400 vs 500

  1. #1
    AgedWood is offline New Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    31

    400 vs 500

    I'm in 200mg/week Trt but want to run a blast, just curious how big of a difference there would be between 400 and 500 a week in results.

  2. #2
    The Bear 79 is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    5,332
    30% BF is double the recommendation 4 cycling bro. If u cycle b4 u get under 15%, u run a much greater risk of SEVERE gyno. Just curious, how did u end up @ 30% BF with 15 years training experience? I know it sounds like I'm talkin sh!it, but I'm not, I swear. It just seems like some1 with that much time in the gym, would b in better shape. Wut does ur routine & diet look like?
    Last edited by The Bear 79; 10-04-2011 at 07:26 PM.

  3. #3
    dec11's Avatar
    dec11 is offline 'everything louder than everything else'
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    *no sources i wont reply*
    Posts
    14,140
    Blog Entries
    1
    agree wit with bear, get that % down beforehand, your trt will hold your muscle nicely in a cal deficit to burn off the fat

  4. #4
    Sector's Avatar
    Sector is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Kitchen
    Posts
    419
    Quote Originally Posted by AgedWood View Post
    I'm in 200mg/week Trt but want to run a blast, just curious how big of a difference there would be between 400 and 500 a week in results.
    If you are indeed above 20% bodyfat I wouldnt risk it. Ive had gyno come on very quickly when I cycled around 16-18% because I didnt bump my AI as well. Had a bitch of a time getting it under control and it somewhat ruined my cycle.

    And to answer your question, theres not much anyone could tell you. Some people get away with tiny doses and some need high doses. We cant really say you will gain X more muscle on 500mg then 400mg, far to many factors.

  5. #5
    AgedWood is offline New Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    31
    Quote Originally Posted by Sector

    If you are indeed above 20% bodyfat I wouldnt risk it. Ive had gyno come on very quickly when I cycled around 16-18% because I didnt bump my AI as well. Had a bitch of a time getting it under control and it somewhat ruined my cycle.

    And to answer your question, theres not much anyone could tell you. Some people get away with tiny doses and some need high doses. We cant really say you will gain X more muscle on 500mg then 400mg, far to many factors.
    Thanks for the feedback. My weight has cycled a lot in the last year from 240 to 218 (low carb, 70 work weeks, little to no exercise) up to 265 (4k cals , 350 protien targets and doing squats, bench, deads mainly) and back down to just under 240 (aerobics,weights, low carb) still likely over 20% BF though. Don't think it is at 30% any more but still too fat anyway. The

    So is gyno the main issue? Not trying to change anyones opinion here, just curious. I have arimidex and nova for gyno.

    Will hold on for a bit and see, just building up reserves from the Trt.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •