Results 1 to 4 of 4
Thread: Short esters/cycles are better?
-
10-29-2011, 09:13 PM #1Junior Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2010
- Posts
- 71
Short esters/cycles are better?
Lets take Sust 250 vs Prop for example... Sust takes 3 weeks to get into/out of your system as opposed to a few days.
Sust 250: Start pinning, test isn’t in your system fully until after 3 weeks, so im guessing you gradually up your calorie intake over that period? Anyway, its still 3 weeks to get up and going. At around week 10 gains start to taper off.
Lets say you do your final pin week 12… you have to wait another 3 weeks to start PCT. PCT for 5-6 weeks.
Now going by time on + PCT = time off rule, that’s over 20 weeks before you can cycle again.
Prop: Start pinning, test is in your system within days, calories are upped fully. No waiting 3 weeks to get started. No waiting 3 weeks to start PCT. 5 weeks PCT.
13 weeks total = you can cycle again in 13 weeks.
How much more would you gain in the extra 7 weeks on sust? Enough to be worth it? Seems like the shorter esters are alot more efficient?
-
10-29-2011, 09:24 PM #2
-
10-29-2011, 09:28 PM #3
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Location
- *no sources i wont reply*
- Posts
- 14,140
- Blog Entries
- 1
-
10-29-2011, 11:33 PM #4Banned
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Location
- Kitchen, Gym, Kitchen....
- Posts
- 13,716
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Zebol 50 - deca?
12-10-2024, 07:18 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS