Results 1 to 2 of 2
Thread: npp vrs deca bulking cycle
-
01-12-2012, 02:37 PM #1
Junior Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Location
- ohio
- Posts
- 123
npp vrs deca bulking cycle
I am thinking of doing a bulking cycle of test 600 and deca 400, or test 600 and npp 400 for 12 weeks. What due you all think about npp being easier to recover from, and giving you leaner gains? I am 35 yrs 6'1'' 17% bfi 240 lbs 5th cycle 12 years in gym. I will use hcg 250iu 2x week during cycle from 2-12, and standard pct nolva and clomid . will run aromason 12.5 mg eod during 1-12. Thanks ahead of time for your input.
-
01-12-2012, 04:03 PM #2
You're a little high on the dose for deca /npp, no? I love both. The benefit (or downside depending on what you're doing) of NPP is the ester. It will kick in faster and you'll be able to recover faster, the down side is more pinning. For a shorter cycle <12 weeks, I'd go with NPP. I think at 12 weeks you could go with deca and be just as fine.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
So far so good, they seem to be doing what they’re supposed to.
Expired dbol (blue hearts)