Extending a 3 month cycle to 4 months

**Julz_W** · 10-26-2012, 09:50 AM

G'day Gents and Gals,

Just wondering. I'm considering a cycle as posted previously in another thread but I have a question about the duration.

If you have a standard 3 month cycle and you extend it to 4 months, is there any issues that would be associated?

Obviously you're natural system is shut down for longer and sides could be increased due to prolonged exposure, but have any of you extended a cycle past the 3 months?

The reason would be my access to free unlimited food at my exact request.

Having 4 months of complete access to something like that I thought it may be advisable to take the best advantage one could.

Cheers

J.

**Lunk1** · 10-26-2012, 10:06 AM

It's not a HUGE deal going from 12 to 16 weeks depending on the compounds. May require a more aggresive PCT and longer recovery time. Not to say that extending doesn't increase risks though!!!!!!!

**jimmyinkedup** · 10-26-2012, 10:08 AM

I just wanna know where one gets in on this unlimited amounts of free food LOL .....

**Julz_W** · 10-26-2012, 10:10 AM

work at a camp - it's shit hours and the brats are horrid but they feed you based on dietry requirements.

**Julz_W** · 10-26-2012, 10:11 AM

compounds would be test prop + test enth

I'll be switching the prop to tren at the halfway mark

**Lunk1** · 10-26-2012, 10:13 AM

Originally Posted by Julz_W

compounds would be test prop + test enth

I'll be switching the prop to tren at the halfway mark

No need to run prop that long as a method of kickstarting a long ester cycle 3 maybe 4 weeks at most is fine!

With extending can you please lay out you cycle with AI and PCT agin...I have no abition to search ypur old threads

**Julz_W** · 10-26-2012, 10:18 AM

Test Enth - 750 per week Weeks 1-16
Test Prop - 500 p/w - shots ed - weeks 1-8 (now 1-4 based on that)

Tren - .50 ED weeks 5-12

Clomid - 40/40/20/20
Nolva - 100/100/50/50 -

thinking i may extend pct to 6 weeks

AI I'd use Ferama and have Letro / Armidex on hand.

Ferama is really powerful so i'm going to avoid taking it as precautionary measure but at an as needed basis - likely .25 ed for time taken for sides to reduce.

**Times Roman** · 10-26-2012, 10:19 AM

this isn't going to be a major problem. however......

extending another 4 weeks will increase your risk of sides, and the additional time will not give you a linear progression of gains. you may incrementally experience some gains, but will be outstripped by the risk of sides. 12 weeks test e or c is the sweet spot. no one will shoot you if you go longer..... =)

**fit2bOld** · 10-26-2012, 10:25 AM

Would suggest running an AI throughout, to many side effect rescues to count on here due to having it on hand. Arimidex .25 eod will do fine.

**hankdiesel** · 10-26-2012, 10:38 AM

your gains will be next to nothing by the end. It's not worth it imo.

**Lunk1** · 10-26-2012, 10:47 AM

I'm glad I got to take a look at this.

1) Lower your test. On a tren cycle there is NO need for 750mg of test. This is the cause of most estro related sides. Lower to 400mg EW will be fine!

2) Choose either Adex or Aromasin to be run during cycle. this will keep E down and help avoid prolactin.

3) PCT should be Nolva 40/20/20/20 and Clomid 100/50/50/50 ( 5 weeks on PCT will suffice)

**songdog** · 10-26-2012, 10:54 AM

IMOP I dont think the gains will be worth it.And there would be NO WAY I could do that job.

**Julz_W** · 10-28-2012, 07:10 PM

What would happen to gains?

Do you guys mean they would be non-existent? Would they stall or what?

And yeah, the job is "unique" spoiled brats always test ones patience, especially while on cycle

**Times Roman** · 10-29-2012, 11:09 AM

Originally Posted by Julz_W

What would happen to gains?

Do you guys mean they would be non-existent? Would they stall or what?

And yeah, the job is "unique" spoiled brats always test ones patience, especially while on cycle

it is a bell shaped curve. if the horizontal axis is time on cycle, and the verticle axis is additional amount of gains, the first 8 weeks or so gains will incrementally increase, and then beyond that, you will still get gains, but each week will experience fewer gains than the week prior, until at some point, the gains will just be flat.

the problem is that the risk of sides graph, if there were one, would like almost like an ever increasing slope. the horizontal axis would be time on cycle, and the verticle axis would be the increase risk of sides. So from left to right, it would look like a slope that increases.