Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 41 to 55 of 55
Like Tree1Likes

Thread: Boldenone undecylenate

  1. #41
    AnabolicDoc's Avatar
    AnabolicDoc is offline Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    777
    Quote Originally Posted by Muscley midget View Post
    How do you manage red blood cell count and blood pressure?
    Drink plenty of fluids to avoid dehydration. Donate blood when possible - I think it's every 6 weeks. Also take a blood pressure medication. Some ppl on this forum love Cialis, which is great if it will keep your BP at or below 130/80. But many ppl will need something stronger. If you have a rapid pulse as well, try metoprolol ER (Toprol XL). That is the succinate salt of it, not the tartrate - 25mg ed is a good starting point and if that's not enough, then increase to 50mg ed. If your pulse runs low , you may want to avoid metoprolol and opt for amlodipine (Norvasc) 2.5 - 5mg ed, clonidine 0.05 - 0.1mg every 12 hours, losartan 25 - 50mg ed, or irbesartan 75mg - 150mg ed. There are many BP meds to choose from. I only mentioned some of the more popular ones and I only included ones that are generically available. A diuretic, like HCTZ or chlorthalidone are good options as well. If you have an enlarged prostate or are at risk of it, then you may want to opt for something else, like Cardura or Hytrin - both are available as generics as well. If you give me any pertinent medical info, I can narrow down the list of BP meds for you. Also, the doses mentioned are for ppl with normal blood pressures to start with. If you generally run high, then you will need a higher dose on cycle.

    (I edited the above for spelling and grammar)
    Last edited by AnabolicDoc; 02-17-2013 at 05:11 PM.

  2. #42
    rmbX66t1 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    130
    Quote Originally Posted by AnabolicDoc View Post
    Drink plenty of fluids to avoid dehydration. Donate blood when possible - I think it's every 6 weeks. And take a blood pressure medication. Some ppl on this forum love Cialis, which is great if it will keep your BP at or below 130/80. But many ppl will need something stronger. If you have a rapid pulse as well, try metoprolol ER (Toprol XL). That is the succinate salt of it, not the tartrate - 25mg ed is a good starting point and if that's not enough, then increase to 50mg ed. If your pulse runs low , you may want to avoid metoprolol and opt for amlodipine (Norvasc) 2.5 - 5mg ed, clonidine 0.05 - 0.1mg every 12 hours, losartan 25 - 50mg ed, or irbesartan 75mg - 150mg ed. There are many BP meds to choose from. I only mentioned some of the more popular ones and I only included ones that are genetically available. A diuretic, like HCTZ or chlorthalidone are good options as well. If you have an enlarged prostate or are at risk of it, then you may want to opt for something else, like Cardura or Hytrin - both are available as genetics as well. If you give me any pertinent medical info, I can narrow down the list of BP meds for you. Also, the doses mentioned are for ppl with normal blood pursues to start with. If you generally run high, then you will need a higher dose on cycle.
    This is my regime to a tee.

  3. #43
    ElectraMaddox is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Paradise
    Posts
    2,000
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by austinite View Post
    It's a great compound to use when you're out of WD-40.

    As for injecting it... you shouldnt. It's a worthless compound. It'll just make you hungry, give you little (if any) gains and increase RBC's to potentially dangerous levels. I'd forget about this compound.

    I'm sure MickeyKnox and MetalJect smell this thread and will chime in soon...
    Mikeyknox told me it was a waste....

  4. #44
    austinite's Avatar
    austinite is offline HRT Specialist ~ AR-Platinum Elite-Hall of Famer ~
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Cialis, Texas
    Posts
    31,169
    Quote Originally Posted by ElectraMaddox View Post
    Mikeyknox told me it was a waste....
    lol, well.. he HAD to experience it for himself!

  5. #45
    MickeyKnox is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    CANADA
    Posts
    13,200
    Quote Originally Posted by Turkish Juicer View Post
    Equipoise is a pretty useless compound and whoever has benefited from it in the past ran it at a weekly dose of at least 750mg.

    This compound was originally intended for horses to give them a huge appetite along with some muscle mass. That's indeed what happens when you inject yourself w/ Equipoise : it gives you the appetite of an horse and allows for huge gains that are mostly from nutrition not AAS.

    It will raise RBC drastically, which contributes to thickening of blood and this has its potential risks of its own.

    There are a few board members here who swear by this compound but frankly EQ would be my last choice of AAS, ever.

    Lastly, it has to be stacked with Testosterone.
    Quote Originally Posted by austinite View Post
    That;s the problem, like TJ said... it has to be ran at high volumes for any result, and that comes with ill effects. Of course you gain when you eat like a horse Anyway... to each his own. I do not recommend this compound for any reason what so ever. If appetite is an issue for some, I refer them to B12.
    Quote Originally Posted by austinite View Post
    hehe. Just for you

    ... And MickeyKnox
    Hardy har har..

    My experience with EQ was a positive one with respect to gaining LBM and strength. I usually defend EQ on its merit alone. But i will not recommend it simply because there are other alternatives than will produce similar results with less compound.

    I used about a gram (1050mg) per wk for about 16wks, + 250mg Test E. So you canb plainly see that i had to use a substantially amount of EQ to produce those results. But it does work and is not "worthless".

    My .02

  6. #46
    austinite's Avatar
    austinite is offline HRT Specialist ~ AR-Platinum Elite-Hall of Famer ~
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Cialis, Texas
    Posts
    31,169
    Quote Originally Posted by MickeyKnox View Post
    Hardy har har..

    My experience with EQ was a positive one with respect to gaining LBM and strength. I usually defend EQ on its merit alone. But i will not recommend it simply because there are other alternatives than will produce similar results with less compound.

    I used about a gram (1050mg) per wk for about 16wks, + 250mg Test E. So you canb plainly see that i had to use a substantially amount of EQ to produce those results. But it does work and is not "worthless".

    My .02
    Finally! haha. still lova ya man.

  7. #47
    MickeyKnox is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    CANADA
    Posts
    13,200
    Quote Originally Posted by ElectraMaddox View Post
    Mikeyknox told me it was a waste....
    I just noticed this. I told you it was a waste at the AMOUNT you were thinking of using. The compound itself is not a waste. It clearly works, but you simply have to use enormous amounts for it to be practical, unfortunately.

    Hope that clears up my comment.

  8. #48
    ElectraMaddox is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Paradise
    Posts
    2,000
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by MickeyKnox View Post
    I just noticed this. I told you it was a waste at the AMOUNT you were thinking of using. The compound itself is not a waste. It clearly works, but you simply have to use enormous amounts for it to be practical, unfortunately.

    Hope that clears up my comment.
    I know what you meant I just didn't elaborate on it correctly in my post.... Sry

  9. #49
    MickeyKnox is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    CANADA
    Posts
    13,200
    Quote Originally Posted by ElectraMaddox View Post
    I know what you meant I just didn't elaborate on it correctly in my post.... Sry
    It's all good in the hood!

  10. #50
    outlaw78 is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    7
    So none of you here pretty much ran eq solo, but yet you all say the same thing just feeding from each other negativity.
    I am running eq solo just do a experiment and see who is right! Keep you all posted. Did get some test-e which i will use if any issues occur. Week one.

  11. #51
    tice1212's Avatar
    tice1212 is offline Productive Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    1,562
    Quote Originally Posted by outlaw78 View Post
    So none of you here pretty much ran eq solo, but yet you all say the same thing just feeding from each other negativity.
    I am running eq solo just do a experiment and see who is right! Keep you all posted. Did get some test-e which i will use if any issues occur. Week one.
    Bro this is a year old thread start. Btw ur not to smart to be running Eq without test..

  12. #52
    outlaw78 is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    7
    Quote Originally Posted by tice1212 View Post
    Bro this is a year old thread start. Btw ur not to smart to be running Eq without test..
    Have you ran it solo? Since it is very similar to test why would I need test? Just few questions to be answered.
    I have ran test before and some other sht, but just wanted to do eq solo and see what happens, also this is done at low dosage.
    I am starting at only 200mg week and I will push that for 3-4 week. Might up it from there if need to be. My biggest concern is my bp going
    up as it did with some other gear. That is why I am running low dosage. I do have test on the side if sides get to be noticeable.
    I have gotten good reviews form people who ran it solo, but this needs to be squashed one and for all. Why do you need test with it? If someone here
    can give me a legit scientific answer regardless to the fact that 'no' eq studies have been done on humans. Give me a tangible reason to why test and eq vs eq alone.

  13. #53
    tectime's Avatar
    tectime is offline Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    964
    I've ran eq by itself once for 8 weeks. It was a long time ago. Can't really say what gains I got or not Finally found some pharma tes at the two month mark and cranked out a big ol tes/deca cycle that was great. I know it bottomed out my nat tes levels cause I had bloods done right before jumping on the tes/deca. Let's hear how you feel on it alone after about 8 wks.

  14. #54
    HawaiiLifr's Avatar
    HawaiiLifr is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Hawaii
    Posts
    319
    Quote Originally Posted by outlaw78 View Post
    Have you ran it solo? Since it is very similar to test why would I need test? Just few questions to be answered.
    I have ran test before and some other sht, but just wanted to do eq solo and see what happens, also this is done at low dosage.
    I am starting at only 200mg week and I will push that for 3-4 week. Might up it from there if need to be. My biggest concern is my bp going
    up as it did with some other gear. That is why I am running low dosage. I do have test on the side if sides get to be noticeable.
    I have gotten good reviews form people who ran it solo, but this needs to be squashed one and for all. Why do you need test with it? If someone here
    can give me a legit scientific answer regardless to the fact that 'no' eq studies have been done on humans. Give me a tangible reason to why test and eq vs eq alone.
    EQ will shut down your ability to produce TEST. You need TEST.

  15. #55
    reporich is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    357
    Quote Originally Posted by outlaw78 View Post
    Have you ran it solo? Since it is very similar to test why would I need test? Just few questions to be answered.
    I have ran test before and some other sht, but just wanted to do eq solo and see what happens, also this is done at low dosage.
    I am starting at only 200mg week and I will push that for 3-4 week. Might up it from there if need to be. My biggest concern is my bp going
    up as it did with some other gear. That is why I am running low dosage. I do have test on the side if sides get to be noticeable.
    I have gotten good reviews form people who ran it solo, but this needs to be squashed one and for all. Why do you need test with it? If someone here
    can give me a legit scientific answer regardless to the fact that 'no' eq studies have been done on humans. Give me a tangible reason to why test and eq vs eq alone.
    Not sure what your trying to achieve but 200mg EQ isn't going to do anything but shut down your natural test production?

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •