Results 1 to 25 of 25
Like Tree5Likes
  • 3 Post By Fcarey32
  • 1 Post By Fcarey32
  • 1 Post By redhawk01

Thread: How much stronger is test prop than test e

  1. #1
    Whiteboyy0 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    206

    How much stronger is test prop than test e

    I've been reading on here that test p is moderately stronger than e. how does 150 mg eod of test prop compare to 500 mg test e? Yes I'm aware that that 150 mg eod adds up to more than 500 mg weekly

  2. #2
    Fcarey32's Avatar
    Fcarey32 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Central Florida
    Posts
    344
    Test is test. Test enanthate & propionate are the same exact hormone, just with a different ester attached causing different release rates. 150/EOD is 525/week. 25mg more of prop a week compared to test E won't yield much of a difference at all. Just one takes longer to work.

  3. #3
    Chx beach 79's Avatar
    Chx beach 79 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    East Coast: on the beach
    Posts
    1,287
    Same exact strength.

  4. #4
    Fcarey32's Avatar
    Fcarey32 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Central Florida
    Posts
    344
    Long story short, exactly what he said.

  5. #5
    Whiteboyy0 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    206
    Quote Originally Posted by Chx beach 79 View Post
    Same exact strength.
    Not according to the steroid profiles on this site. It says you actually get less testosterone per mg you inject because of the longer ester

  6. #6
    Chx beach 79's Avatar
    Chx beach 79 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    East Coast: on the beach
    Posts
    1,287
    Good to know... I have used both and haven't noticed a difference. Of course I could maybe dig up some old bloodwork and see if that's true.

  7. #7
    Fcarey32's Avatar
    Fcarey32 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Central Florida
    Posts
    344
    It's not much of a significant difference, if any at all.

  8. #8
    Bonaparte's Avatar
    Bonaparte is offline AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    13,506
    It's a 17% difference, if I recall.
    Test E is 70% test, and prop is 87% I think.

  9. #9
    Fcarey32's Avatar
    Fcarey32 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Central Florida
    Posts
    344
    But that shouldn't matter if the concentrations were the same, the enan would just take up more volume, correct?

  10. #10
    GrimmReaper's Avatar
    GrimmReaper is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Hell
    Posts
    1,057
    Quote Originally Posted by Bonaparte View Post
    It's a 17% difference, if I recall.
    Test E is 70% test, and prop is 87% I think.
    You learn something new everyday on this forum.

  11. #11
    Java Man's Avatar
    Java Man is offline Known Troll
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    The Matrix
    Posts
    4,327
    Quote Originally Posted by Bonaparte View Post
    It's a 17% difference, if I recall.
    Test E is 70% test, and prop is 87% I think.
    By weight or by volume?

  12. #12
    lstbred's Avatar
    lstbred is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    NorCal
    Posts
    1,059
    Is it the dilution rate that makes the final difference?

  13. #13
    Fcarey32's Avatar
    Fcarey32 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Central Florida
    Posts
    344
    Quote Originally Posted by Java Man

    By weight or by volume?
    I'm pretty sure it weighs more seeing as enanthates atomic mass is greater than propionates, and that also leads me to believe it takes up more space. Seems like that anyways. 200mg of enan is 140mg test & 200mg of prop would weigh out to be 174mg of actual test.

    But back to op's question, the ester doesn't make it any stronger at all, just more potent.
    Java Man likes this.

  14. #14
    Lunk1's Avatar
    Lunk1 is offline aka "JOB"
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    METHAMERICA
    Posts
    16,397
    Quote Originally Posted by Bonaparte View Post
    It's a 17% difference, if I recall.
    Test E is 70% test, and prop is 87% I think.
    That sounds right as I believe tren A is 20% vs Tren E

  15. #15
    redhawk01's Avatar
    redhawk01 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    581
    Breakdown:
    100mgs test susp=100mgs test
    100mgs test cyp= roughly 70mgs test
    100 mgs test prop= roughly 87mgs test
    Cyp and E are very similar. Horse a piece.

    I can't find the #'s at the moment. So this is from past reading.
    Java Man likes this.

  16. #16
    Chx beach 79's Avatar
    Chx beach 79 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    East Coast: on the beach
    Posts
    1,287
    Good to know! You learn something everyday around here!

  17. #17
    Whiteboyy0 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    206
    So would 525mg of test p have a stronger effect on test levels than 500 mg test e? Or is it negligible?

  18. #18
    Fcarey32's Avatar
    Fcarey32 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Central Florida
    Posts
    344
    Quote Originally Posted by Whiteboyy0
    So would 525mg of test p have a stronger effect on test levels than 500 mg test e? Or is it negligible?
    Yes, moderately significant if these findings are true.

  19. #19
    redhawk01's Avatar
    redhawk01 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    581
    Sometimes guys use prop on the back end of a blast when on TRT. Clears faster before bloodwork can be done for the doc. Then go back to TRT dose prior to bloods.
    I guess in theory, one could use it to kick start, similar to a d- bol kick for 4 weeks.

  20. #20
    Bonaparte's Avatar
    Bonaparte is offline AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    13,506
    Quote Originally Posted by Fcarey32 View Post
    Yes, moderately significant if these findings are true.
    Of course they are. It is just basic math with atomic weights.
    And it has nothing to do with density or concentration (once brewed). It is just that esters have mass (duh) and longer ones obviously weigh more and occupy a larger portion of the raw powder.
    Last edited by Bonaparte; 07-15-2013 at 12:28 AM.

  21. #21
    austinite's Avatar
    austinite is offline HRT Specialist ~ AR-Platinum Elite-Hall of Famer ~
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Cialis, Texas
    Posts
    31,169
    Stronger is the wrong word really.
    ~ PLEASE DO NOT ASK FOR SOURCE CHECKS ~

    "It's human nature in a 'more is better' society full of a younger generation that expects instant gratification, then complain when they don't get it. The problem will get far worse before it gets better". ~ kelkel

  22. #22
    kelkel's Avatar
    kelkel is offline HRT Specialist ~ AR-Platinum Elite-Hall of Famer ~ No Source Checks
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    East Coast Dungeon
    Posts
    30,122
    Quote Originally Posted by redhawk01 View Post
    Breakdown:
    100mgs test susp=100mgs test
    100mgs test cyp= roughly 70mgs test
    100 mgs test prop= roughly 87mgs test
    Cyp and E are very similar. Horse a piece.

    I can't find the #'s at the moment. So this is from past reading.
    Red what the hell is that ^^?
    -*- NO SOURCE CHECKS -*-

  23. #23
    ChiveOn's Avatar
    ChiveOn is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    SoCal USA
    Posts
    1,404
    Quote Originally Posted by redhawk01 View Post
    Breakdown:
    100mgs test susp=100mgs test
    100mgs test cyp= roughly 70mgs test
    100 mgs test prop= roughly 87mgs test
    Cyp and E are very similar. Horse a piece.

    I can't find the #'s at the moment. So this is from past reading.
    Something close to this. It all comes down to the weight of the ester attached

  24. #24
    redhawk01's Avatar
    redhawk01 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    581
    Quote Originally Posted by kelkel

    Red what the hell is that ^^?
    Lol. Ever play bar dice? One tie all tie. Basically means they're the same.
    Maybe it's a Wisconsin / Midwest thing.

  25. #25
    SEOINAGE's Avatar
    SEOINAGE is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    2,863
    I was messing with this online calculator and it made quite a lot of sense. Because of props shorter half life you used up what you injected much faster. Basically your peak levels would be much lower with 500 mg a prop vs 500 mg of enanthate . Although the enanthate might take 4 times as long to reach peak concentrations, your peak concentration would still be higher theoretically. The first bunch of injects float around longer making you have more, not to mention it takes longer to get out of your system, so in essence some of it is wasted. Prop just seems like a much better and more efficient, healthier approach. And I would imagine easier to manage e2 and sides etc. Hit hard and fast and then get off fast.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •