Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    qscgugcsq's Avatar
    qscgugcsq is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    2,028

    Question Deca vs NPP recovery time?!?

    I've read many times how deca is suppressive and how it make the recovery harder.
    It makes sense, it is HIGHLY suppressive and the metabolite stay for a very long time in the body.
    + the progesterone who is also present.

    I was wondering if NPP had the same effect.
    Of course they are both Nandrolone and NPP is also VERY supressive.
    However his half life is obviously shorter and his detection time is 33% shorter than deca.(from steroid .com)

    If so, I guess the same apply with other 19 nor such as Trenbolone (acetate-enanthate )

    Is that only Nandrolone making recovery hard or it is the 19nor property of the compound??
    I would like to know your experience with 19nor and your recovery experience from these cycle.

    Thanks


    Bonus question: Does finishing NPP 2 weeks prior test would help the recovery or is unnecessary?? / (Example: 6 week NPP + 8 Week test-p)

  2. #2
    Lunk1's Avatar
    Lunk1 is offline aka "JOB"
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    METHAMERICA
    Posts
    16,396
    Obviouse answer is...everyone is different. To be more specific, 19nors are very suppressive all though I hate to use that term considering all AAS is suppressive. The reality is that Tren and Deca tend to be more difficult for some to recover from than most AAS. NPP being nothing more than a short ester version of Deca will cause the same issues only faster.

    Running your test out 2 weeks past Deca is always a good idea due to the longer time Deca stays in the system as you mentioned above. Does that make a difference with recovery? Not IMO. Essentially the "damage" is done and recovery will depend on the individual response and PCT.

  3. #3
    qscgugcsq's Avatar
    qscgugcsq is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    2,028
    Thanks for the answer.

  4. #4
    Bert is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    1,826
    I would think so.

  5. #5
    Bonaparte's Avatar
    Bonaparte is offline AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    13,506
    It won't make much difference, as it's all the same nandrolone once the ester is cleaved off.

  6. #6
    2jz_calgary's Avatar
    2jz_calgary is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    calgary alberta canada
    Posts
    1,015
    I've read decas long ester causes sides in many. IMO Npp would be easier to recover from due to less ester. I recovered from Npp no problem. Just my opinion.

  7. #7
    qscgugcsq's Avatar
    qscgugcsq is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    2,028
    Quote Originally Posted by 2jz_calgary View Post
    I've read decas long ester causes sides in many. IMO Npp would be easier to recover from due to less ester. I recovered from Npp no problem. Just my opinion.
    Nice to know thanks.

    Anyone else had difficulty or no difference at all for the recovery with short vs long ester?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •