Do you think EQ in doses less than 800mg/week are pointless?

**Ibasmusi** · 11-11-2013, 05:22 PM

So what is the general consensus here? Just wondering. Some people say 600mg/week, but i feel like EQ should be ran higher. Thoughts?

**Trevtrev** · 11-11-2013, 07:55 PM

Have a friend that ran 600/wk and loved it. He was reminiscing today actually. Seems there are not many eq fans on this board. Some like it, most don't.

**Bert** · 11-11-2013, 08:44 PM

I run it for 600mg, as that seems to be the sweet spot.

**Hazard** · 11-11-2013, 08:47 PM

Fvcking useless at any dose..... That's been my personal experience

**redz** · 11-11-2013, 08:49 PM

600mg was a waste of oil for me. I`ll never touch the stuff again even for free.

**austinite** · 11-11-2013, 08:52 PM

I'd rather inject shards of glass with a 2 gauge funnel into an open wound.

**redz** · 11-11-2013, 08:56 PM

Wheres the can?

**probuild42** · 11-11-2013, 09:00 PM

Click image for larger version.

Name: trash-can.gif
Views: 135
Size: 11.5 KB
ID: 145835

**Ibasmusi** · 11-12-2013, 02:59 AM

Originally Posted by austinite

I'd rather inject shards of glass with a 2 gauge funnel into an open wound.

LOL. Not really sure about THAT!

**marcus300** · 11-12-2013, 03:52 AM

Useless at any dose IMHO and for those who speak highly of it which are very few they are getting confused with the other compounds within the stack what is causing the gains. If your going to inject a steroid to produce muscle gains then use something what will do the job and not something what is weak, poor and useless.

**Ibasmusi** · 11-12-2013, 07:27 AM

So if you guys say it is useless, what is your take on it when Ben Johnson used it in the olympics and killed everyone on it by a mile and says his success was from eq?

**marcus300** · 11-12-2013, 07:31 AM

Originally Posted by Ibasmusi

So if you guys say it is useless, what is your take on it when Ben Johnson used it in the olympics and killed everyone on it by a mile and says his success was from eq?

I think it was winny not eq,

**Ibasmusi** · 11-12-2013, 07:35 AM

Ah i see

**marcus300** · 11-12-2013, 07:38 AM

Originally Posted by Ibasmusi

Ah i see

If your hell bent on trying it why don't you go on a eq cycle and see for yourself, try it at 600-800mgs per week along side maintenance dose of test say 100mgs per and log the results over a 12 week period. I have by the way twice

**songdog** · 11-12-2013, 07:41 AM

Originally Posted by Ibasmusi

So if you guys say it is useless, what is your take on it when Ben Johnson used it in the olympics and killed everyone on it by a mile and says his success was from eq?

I really don't think this was a very thought out statement.

**redz** · 11-12-2013, 09:00 AM

Ben Johnson used winstrol not EQ for sure. EQ is the ugly bastard child of steroids that nobody likes.

**Ibasmusi** · 11-12-2013, 09:03 AM

Originally Posted by marcus300

If your hell bent on trying it why don't you go on a eq cycle and see for yourself, try it at 600-800mgs per week along side maintenance dose of test say 100mgs per and log the results over a 12 week period. I have by the way twice

Im not hell bent on trying it. I HAVE tried it and i love EQ

.

**Ibasmusi** · 11-12-2013, 09:03 AM

Originally Posted by redz

Ben Johnson used winstrol not EQ for sure. EQ is the ugly bastard child of steroids that nobody likes.

Hmmm. The documentary i watched "bigger stronger faster" talks about him using eq.

**Ibasmusi** · 11-12-2013, 09:10 AM

Originally Posted by marcus300

If your hell bent on trying it why don't you go on a eq cycle and see for yourself, try it at 600-800mgs per week along side maintenance dose of test say 100mgs per and log the results over a 12 week period. I have by the way twice

And eq is used as a BASE to a cycle for added results, not to be used as a main component with a "test base" lol.

**jimmyinkedup** · 11-12-2013, 09:12 AM

Originally Posted by marcus300

I think it was winny not eq,

Well since he tested positive for Winstrol Id say your 100% right Marcus.
Horrible analogy anyway OP.
EQ..years ago I used to think it was good...now I know better.

**Ibasmusi** · 11-12-2013, 09:14 AM

Originally Posted by jimmyinkedup

Well since he tested positive for Winstrol Id say your 100% right Marcus. Horrible analogy anyway OP. EQ..years ago I used to think it was good...now I know better.

What do you mean horrible analogy? I thought it was basic knowledge that you dont use EQ as your main on a cycle. Please elaborate and give a better analogy if you are going to knock mine.

**marcus300** · 11-12-2013, 10:35 AM

Originally Posted by Ibasmusi

And eq is used as a BASE to a cycle for added results, not to be used as a main component with a "test base" lol.

EQ is a weak compound and the small few who like it are being tricked by the other compounds within the stack, why even use something what doesn't produce gains when there are plenty of other compounds what will put some decent size on your frame. If you like it carry on using it but for me I wouldn't use it ever again.

**Ibasmusi** · 11-12-2013, 10:45 AM

Originally Posted by marcus300

EQ is a weak compound and the small few who like it are being tricked by the other compounds within the stack, why even use something what doesn't produce gains when there are plenty of other compounds what will put some decent size on your frame. If you like it carry on using it but for me I wouldn't use it every again.

Understood

**jimmyinkedup** · 11-12-2013, 01:10 PM

Originally Posted by Ibasmusi

What do you mean horrible analogy? I thought it was basic knowledge that you dont use EQ as your main on a cycle. Please elaborate and give a better analogy if you are going to knock mine.

I was referring to the Ben Johnson analogy. Not only was it winstrol not eq#1, but #2 is your goal to become a world class sprinter? Or even just to run faster?
Yeah I stand behind what I said ..horrible analogy....