Results 1 to 11 of 11
-
12-09-2014, 10:53 AM #1
Luliberin vs HCG - explanation for dummies
I am hoping one or more of our Vets/Mods/KMs can explain this to me in terms I understand.
I have been reading about using Luliberin instead of HCG . Reading in some places how it's far superior to HCG and only requires to be used in very short intervals (10days)...
So my questions are:
1. what the hell is Luliberin? (Not just the wiki answer)
2. Is it superior to HCG (in you opinion why or why not)
3. Would you or have you tried using it after a hard shut down, or just to bridge between cycle and PCT?
4. Obviously HCG for entire on cycle prevents atrophy.....could one run HCG on, Luliberin bridge and Nolva only PCT, and recover quicker?
I'm new to the game, I try to find the answers without making stupid posts but this one has me baffled. If it has been asked, answered and beat to death previously, please just link it to me and I'll keep reading.
-
12-09-2014, 12:27 PM #2
To add to this, if I understand correctly:
Luliberin: Stimulates release of both FSH & LH
Whereas
HCG : only stimulates release of LH.
Our HPTA depends on the synergy of the 2 for proper body function...
...am I over thinking this? Cause my f**kin head hurts trying to put it all together!
-
12-09-2014, 12:38 PM #3
Banned
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Posts
- 4,648
Originally Posted by RigPig
hCG is very similar in molecular structure to LH and basically acts as LH in one's body.
-
12-09-2014, 01:00 PM #4
Originally Posted by The Deadlifting Dog
Any idea how Luliberin and HCG compare?
-
12-09-2014, 01:07 PM #5
they dont...
hcg imitate lh
other one stimulate.
therefor it would.compare more to nolva/clomid
-
12-09-2014, 01:11 PM #6
Originally Posted by qscgugcsq
Would it be advisable?
***i ask because I've learned a boat load from them members of this site. I am hoping for more the yes or no. Help me see the light people! This is the research part we preach to the young kids day after day.
-
12-09-2014, 01:15 PM #7
I have no idea Ive never heard kf that product.
-
12-09-2014, 01:17 PM #8
I will gladly try it after my next cycle and report my findings but in this day and age I feel like the "blind experiment" part of AAS is a thing of the past. Someone here must have run this before. Maybe availability is a reason it's not common place, maybe it's a f**kin stupid idea and been proven more risky then it's worth.
I have found write ups about it on other forums but I am skeptical of any other place than this, in those same forums I've read about using Luliberin I've seen ill advised cycles ect ect. This place has become my bible so to speak lol. If I can't get an answer here it's not worth it to me.Last edited by RigPig; 12-09-2014 at 01:20 PM.
-
12-09-2014, 01:57 PM #9
when we are talking about recovery I would stick wih a proven method...
being a ginea pig in that matter can be very detrimental...
-
12-09-2014, 02:17 PM #10
Originally Posted by qscgugcsq
-
12-09-2014, 11:38 PM #11
I am bumping this one time before it gets lost in the thread abyss of yesteryear...hope there is some more input in the AM when I check again. If not then it is what it is. Thanks to TDD & q for your input.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
So far so good, they seem to be doing what they’re supposed to.
Expired dbol (blue hearts)