Sarms vs Steroids

[Bonaparte]

I'm convinced that there is a negative correlation between one's intelligence and the frequency with which they use the words "my personal opinion" or something similar. Maybe I'll prove it one day with a study and display it as a line graph...

[Mr.BB]

there was a post where i concluded its not worth the sides. not sure about liver damage though, but for sure had to do PCT, it is suppressive. BTW i ran SARMS before i got on TRT. now that i am on TRT SARMS is crap compared to Testosterone.

If there is something I would never jeoperdize its my eyesight.

Seems like many ppl did not read your post/log, or they dont care about being blind. FFS.

[Trapology]

I'm convinced that there is a negative correlation between one's intelligence and the frequency with which they use the words "my personal opinion" or something similar. Maybe I'll prove it one day with a study and display it as a line graph...

Im convinced there is a negative correlation in people who continue to do generic cookie cutter things and take no effort to find out what does and doesnt work for them personally, considering everyone is different

We should make studies together, there might be some type of award on the future for us

[Bonaparte]

Im convinced there is a negative correlation in people who continue to do generic cookie cutter things and take no effort to find out what does and doesnt work for them personally, considering everyone is different

We should make studies together, there might be some type of award on the future for us

I don't think you understand what a negative correlation is.

[Trapology]

I don't think you understand what a negative correlation is.

[DGenRit]

When I was young I didnt know anything about gear, didnt know much about researching on the internet so i didnt know the proper way to do things, i ran every cycle with no pct, ran cycles with test as no base, list goes on and on

Fast forward a few years im much more knowledgeable and I run dont run anything more then 125mg test e and 100mg tren E for 10 months and I take 2 off. So although I understand my body being younger helped the rebound in the early years, I ran the cycle I just said without running pct to see if I would have problems recovering and I never have. Im not prone to gyno and i never have any of the problems people complain about when I come off. At the end of the 2 months I get blood work done to see if i returned to normal and I have every time

So when

Trapology - you run 125 Test e and 100 Tren 1x week or EOD? Also you do this for 10 months straight with no break? Or did you mean 10 weeks?

[Trapology]

Trapology - you run 125 Test e and 100 Tren 1x week or EOD? Also you do this for 10 months straight with no break? Or did you mean 10 weeks?

Every week, both E esters
10 months straight, 2 off

[AR's King Silabolin]

Wait what? U don't need a pct after a SARM cycle?! Yes u do bro. I don't know where you've got ur info from but that's wrong. SARMS are still suppressive. I've done a SARM cycle with no test to see if it was true and guess what it is.

There are sarms which are not supressive. And some, ostarine is so ligth supressive that with a moderate dose i wouldnt swallow female breast cancer medicine to deal with that.

[musclestack]

Every week, both E esters
10 months straight, 2 off

Maybe I'm missing something here...I'm not going to go back and read your post history, but are you on TRT? If not, your blood work, as far as Test levels go, may be 'normal' because the compounds you're using have only been cleared from your body for a few weeks before you hop right back on. Either way, if you're other blood work is what you call normal right now, I wouldn't expect that trend to carry on for too much longer. To each his own, and I appreciate the fact that you're not advising others to follow in your footsteps, but I hope that sometime in the near future, you make wiser decisions for yourself.

[Trapology]

Maybe I'm missing something here...I'm not going to go back and read your post history, but are you on TRT? If not, your blood work, as far as Test levels go, may be 'normal' because the compounds you're using have only been cleared from your body for a few weeks before you hop right back on. Either way, if you're other blood work is what you call normal right now, I wouldn't expect that trend to carry on for too much longer. To each his own, and I appreciate the fact that you're not advising others to follow in your footsteps, but I hope that sometime in the near future, you make wiser decisions for yourself.

Well the trend has continued on for 6 years. You didnt read but i did mention i dont expect this to continue on but so far ive been fortunate. And not im not on trt, ive dont many cycles and this is just what ive decided works best for me, for what my goals are i do better running a cycle like this then I do using more compound or larger amounts for a shorter period of time

[musclestack]

Well the trend has continued on for 6 years. You didnt read but i did mention i dont expect this to continue on but so far ive been fortunate. And not im not on trt, ive dont many cycles and this is just what ive decided works best for me, for what my goals are i do better running a cycle like this then I do using more compound or larger amounts for a shorter period of time

Well, like I said, to each his own. Stay safe.

[applips]

While we are on the same topic, what about SARMS S22

its injectable so no risk to the liver

[Mr.BB]

About the claims SARMs are not supressive you might wnat to check this guy bloodwork: First cycle and diet, Help is appreciated.

[applips]

About the claims SARMs are not supressive you might wnat to check this guy bloodwork: First cycle and diet, Help is appreciated.

Thanks BB