Results 1 to 29 of 29
-
02-04-2017, 11:19 PM #1New Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2016
- Posts
- 16
Help me piece this together
Ok so I'm going to do my 1st cycle and here is what I have access to.
I'm in TRT.. so every Monday I get 150mg of Test C with 500 hcg and arimidex however I forget mg dosage of arimidex
I'm going to add 250 mg of test C on Thursday,
I also have masteron and tren ace I believe I should hit 100 mg EOD of these. Is that correct? Going to hit this for 6 weeks then switch to something for mass. Is this good for 6 weeks of cutting? Is my dosage correct?
Also I have plenty of arimidex on hand should I hit that EOD as well. Anything I'm missing?
-
02-04-2017, 11:23 PM #2
Definitely check out this post on first time cycles
My First Cycle: Planning and Executing a Successful First Cycle
-
02-05-2017, 12:02 AM #3New Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2016
- Posts
- 16
I've read this. I'm prepared nutrition wise, blood work is done every 3 weeks for TRT as it is.ive done a testosterone only cycle before and has great results. I should of said this is my first multi steroid cycle. Based on what I posted does it look ok?
-
02-05-2017, 01:52 AM #4
What is your cycle history?
Height?
Weight?
Bodyfat %?
-
02-05-2017, 02:30 AM #5New Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2016
- Posts
- 16
Test P 500 mg 12 weeks twice
5 ft 10 in
212 lbs
17.1% bf
-
02-05-2017, 02:45 AM #6
And your goals for the cycle are to cut and bulk? Which probably means you will end up around the same fat levels. You should decide what you want, cut or bulk and go from there. If it's bulk then cut before you start your cycle.
Mast will do nothing at your fat level in any event so it's pointless. However, you should only add one compound at a time in any event. Tren can be a bit of an animal, hopefully you know how to control your E2 on 400mg test per week so you won't need a DA but you should have one on hand anyway.
Most will recommend you run several cycle before you touch tren but you're a grown man you can decide for yourself. IMO 75mg of tren ace rod for 8 weeks is more than enough for at least a first tren cycle.
-
02-05-2017, 03:02 AM #7"ARs Pork Eating Crusader"
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Location
- A world without islam!!!!
- Posts
- 7,092
-
02-05-2017, 08:27 AM #8New Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2016
- Posts
- 16
Euroholic..that is correct
-
02-05-2017, 01:15 PM #9New Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2016
- Posts
- 16
-
02-05-2017, 06:09 PM #10"ARs Pork Eating Crusader"
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Location
- A world without islam!!!!
- Posts
- 7,092
-
02-05-2017, 08:28 PM #11New Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2016
- Posts
- 16
Yes going to the doctor for them. The doc won't administer it more than once every six days but I can only get there on Mondays. I know I'm not getting the best however my t level was 417 now it's 740'with 170.1 free.
-
02-05-2017, 08:35 PM #12
-
02-05-2017, 10:00 PM #13New Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2016
- Posts
- 16
I'm not sure but that's what my blood work says. Anyway back to my original post. Anyone have an answer to it
-
02-05-2017, 10:09 PM #14
Beware that this will mess with your bloodwork. How often does your Dr require it?
-
02-05-2017, 11:15 PM #15New Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2016
- Posts
- 16
-
02-06-2017, 01:01 AM #16Banned
- Join Date
- Jan 2017
- Posts
- 146
Keep your TRT at maintenance levels, no need to increase it (The Tren is 5x more potent) and higher levels of Test will only cause more estrogen, thus more likelihood of prolactin.
-
02-06-2017, 02:43 AM #17
-
02-06-2017, 03:00 AM #18
I agree that mast isn't just for low BF.
Yes, that's when it will bring out that shredded physique,
but you could say that about a lot of compounds.
Tren will look totally different on someone below 10% BF than one above.
The cons about mast IMO;
It's not that strong as an anabolic , compared to cost
A few react to how androgenic it is, losing hair, etc,
(But generally well tolerated)
And that's about the only cons I see with it.
Including it will add some anabolism and probably make you feel better,
but it's weak, and for gaining lean mass there are lots of other options.
-
02-06-2017, 10:41 AM #19New Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2016
- Posts
- 16
-
02-06-2017, 11:34 AM #20
Just add the tren , no need to add 2 compounds.
Whilst I agree that mast isn't useless at higher bodyfat it really won't shine either.
-
02-06-2017, 11:37 AM #21New Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2016
- Posts
- 16
-
02-06-2017, 11:50 AM #22
Read this:
Atomini's all-you-need-to-know about TREN and how to use it effectively thread!
Consider simply adding a low to moderate dose of tren . It doesn't take much to get great results if diet and training are on point.
-
02-06-2017, 05:53 PM #23Banned
- Join Date
- Jan 2017
- Posts
- 146
It's a shame that thread's closed, it's quite interesting and explains why so many people seem to have troubles with tren . Provided the OP wasn't entirely full of BS because the whole thing is a tad one-sided.
-
02-06-2017, 06:03 PM #24RETIRED- Knowledgeable member
- Join Date
- May 2014
- Posts
- 4,109
Maybe you should write a new thread on tren that we can make a sticky.
-
02-06-2017, 06:25 PM #25
Yes, you will have to add the second test injection. Keep in mind, this will mess up your blood work from your doctors point of view. It will shoot your test numbers way up which might result in your doctor lowering or even cutting off your TRT treatment. If you can avoid getting blood work during the blast it would make things easier for you with your doctor.
I know nobody wants to hear this but I see no reason for the tren . If you have done 2 cycles of test only and gotten good results, stick with this. I believe you should only be adding compounds when you stop getting the results you want from test. As the adage goes, if it ain't broke, don't fix it.
-
02-06-2017, 08:20 PM #26Banned
- Join Date
- Jan 2017
- Posts
- 146
I'd quite like to try Atomini's cycle but struggle to find many people who have done similar to cross-reference with to verify and provide peer-reviewed advice.
The going arguments in favour of Tren are that you can potentially experience even less side-affects by maintaining natural/stable estrogen levels using a nor-19 and avoiding AI's, plus experience added benefits from the cabergoline.
The going argument against Tren seems to be that some people just naturally react terribly to it (cough, insomnia, trenrage)
-
02-06-2017, 08:25 PM #27RETIRED- Knowledgeable member
- Join Date
- May 2014
- Posts
- 4,109
I'm not sure what type of tren cycle to which you are referencing.
No offense but if your AVI is representative of your current physique then you don't need to use tren to make great improvements.
-
02-06-2017, 10:04 PM #28Banned
- Join Date
- Jan 2017
- Posts
- 146
Pretty much just 100mg test and 250mg tren a week (+hcg and caber). Then again it is the equivalent of running 1350mg or so test a week compared to the 500mg recommended on the first time cycle thread.
(This is based on the assumption that a lot of tren side-affects don't seem to kick in until 300mg a week such as the rage and respiratory issues)
Cabergoline apparently brings benefits to libido, mood and sleep. Compared to Arimidex which brings joint pain and high blood pressure.
That's the basic premise why it can be a preferable cycle.
This may all be BS once again, because it's based on hearsay- most feedback on Tren is in an entirely different context (usually in way larger amounts, in already overloaded complex stacks)
I probably don't need steroids at all, but I have my reasons (good and bad). I make slow but consistent gains having to rely on a lot of dumbbell work (split moves, isolation, slightly higher reps) due to injuries and a retarded metabolism sustained from 25 years of childhood obesity/yoyo diets/excessive cardio/misguided strength training. Taken a good 3 years to really find what works and doesn't result in writing myself off for 3 months. Sadly now I'm nearly 31 so can kiss goodbye any of the blessings of youth regarding T levels hence why I find myself reading and researching steroids several hours a day. If the gains don't stick, then so be it.. will go back to focusing on keeping bf% low. I'll probably be on TRT in 10 years anyway given the short-stick I drew from the genetics pool
-
02-06-2017, 10:27 PM #29RETIRED- Knowledgeable member
- Join Date
- May 2014
- Posts
- 4,109
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Zebol 50 - deca?
12-10-2024, 07:18 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS